Brake pads ATE or Project Mu

Project Mu Brake pads
Shift9303
  • Braking:
  • Noise:
Rating 4.0

Consider Project Mu Club Racers. They’re not the most aggressive pads but hold up decently well on track depending on your pace and are surprisingly streetable.

Pros: decent on track, surprisingly streetable
Cons: not most aggressive
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
ATE Brake pads

If you’ve still got UFO fronts the part number for pads is ATE 602847 (13.0460-2847.2)

Pros: UFO front pads
Vehicle: Audi 200
Part number: ATE 602847 (13.0460-2847.2)
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
ATE Brake pads
miniCotulla
  • Braking:
  • Dust:
Rating 3.0

Meiner Erfahrung nach bremst das genauso gut wie andere Bremsen, das Problem ist nach 10tkm sportlicher Fahrweise sind Bel\u00e4ge und Scheiben leer, normale Fahrweise max 20tkm. Felgen Kohlschwarz weil nat\u00fcrlich mega viel Bremsstaub in kurzer Zeit.

Pros: bremst genauso gut
Cons: Bel\u00e4ge und Scheiben leer
Mileage: 10000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
ATE Brake pads

We use ATE here in Germany. Rear brake pads will probably require a diagnostic device to disengage the electrical parking brake.

Cons: requires diagnostic device
Vehicle: Mercedes
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons

Which brake pads to choose — ATE or Project Mu?

If choosing brake pads across many manufacturers, check the part ranking. If your choice is down to two brands, the PartReview part comparisons help.

We compare brake pads across these categories:

Comparison of brake pads ATE and Project Mu
  1. PR Score.
  2. Overall ranking.
  3. Vote balance.
  4. Average rating.
  5. Number of reviews.
  6. Feature ratings.
  7. Car owners’ choice.

Which brake pads are better — Project Mu or ATE?

In March 2026 on PartReview, brake pads ATE were overall better than Project Mu.

  1. ATE received a PR Score of 87 out of 100, and Project Mu scored 94 points.
  2. ATE ranked 11 in the overall ranking, and Project Mu ranked 21.
  3. The average rating is higher for Project Mu (4.2) than for Project Mu (4.2).

Which brake pads are more popular — ATE or Project Mu?

In March 2026 on PartReview, brake pads ATE were overall more popular than Project Mu.

By vote balance, brake pads ATE surpassed Project Mu:

  • For ATE, the ratio of positive (154) to negative (22) votes is 132 votes.
  • For Project Mu, the ratio of positive (64) to negative (4) votes is 60 votes.

By number of reviews, brake pads ATE surpassed Project Mu:

Which brake pads do car owners prefer — ATE or Project Mu?

In March 2026, according to PartReview, brake pads ATE led more car-specific ratings than Project Mu:

ATE are chosen by owners of cars such as: BMW M4, Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Polo, and others.

Project Mu are chosen by owners of cars such as: Renault Megane, and others.

Other comparisons of brake pads

If this comparison didn’t fully answer your question, there are many others on PartReview.

For example, comparisons of brake pads ATE with: EBC, POWER STOP, Akebono, Hawk Performance, Brembo, Ferodo, OEM Volkswagen, Bosch, STOPTECH, Carbotech.

Also available: comparisons of brake pads Project Mu with: EBC, POWER STOP, Akebono, Hawk Performance, Brembo, Ferodo, OEM Volkswagen, Bosch, STOPTECH, Carbotech.

You can also see who is better among other brake pads manufacturers: EBC or POWER STOP, EBC or Akebono, EBC or Hawk Performance, Brembo or EBC, Akebono or POWER STOP.

Loading...