Brake pads ATE or Hawk Performance

Hawk Performance Brake pads
FarSolar
  • Braking:
Rating 5.0

I've enjoyed my Hawk HPS 5.0 pads quite a bit, though I have the PP brakes. Handled a track day very well with no fade (I'm no pro so I'm sure they can fade if pushed hard enough).

Pros: handled track day well
Cons: can fade if pushed
Vehicle: Volkswagen
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
ATE Brake pads

If you’ve still got UFO fronts the part number for pads is ATE 602847 (13.0460-2847.2)

Pros: UFO front pads
Vehicle: Audi 200
Part number: ATE 602847 (13.0460-2847.2)
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Hawk Performance Brake pads
jbourne0129
  • Braking:
  • Noise:
  • Dust:
Rating 4.0

i run dedicated track pads, HAWK HP+ . they are loud and filthy but perform phenomenally well for my skill level.

Pros: phenomenal performance
Cons: loud, filthy
Vehicle: Toyota
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Hawk Performance Brake pads

If you want upgraded pads. Try HAWK 5.0 pads. You can't go wrong with a better initial bit, better response and shorter stopping distance.

Pros: better initial bit, better response
Cons: may make noise
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Hawk Performance Brake pads
RodNokRx8
  • Braking:
  • Noise:
  • Dust:
Rating 3.5

I really like my hawk er1’s. They work whether they’re cold or hot. I daily drive my rx8 during the summer, and drive to track days and autoX. They are squeaky and pretty dusty

Pros: work cold or hot
Cons: squeaky, pretty dusty
Vehicle: Mazda
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Hawk Performance Brake pads

WRT the Hawk Pads… I’ve run both compounds and for a beginner you’re not going to notice the difference. They’re both good track pads. Do not run them on the street or if you do try to minimize the time you are on them and know you will have horrible stopping distance when cold.

Pros: good track pads
Cons: not for street, poor cold stopping
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 46

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...