Battery OEM Mazda or Varta

Varta Battery
MrTSI
  • Cranking:
Rating 4.0

I got just over 7 years from the factory Varta battery in my old 2015 MK7. It was the smaller H4 size and always started flawlessly in the Canadian winter. It ended up failing in the early summer. It cranked rather slowly one morning and the voltage refused to go above 12.3, even after charging. It barely started when I went to get the new battery. I was lucky enough to not get stranded.

Pros: long lifespan (7 years), flawless cold starts
Cons: sudden failure
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Varta Battery

Got a Japanese one: Varta Automotive EFB Car Battery Q-85/115D23L 12v 70Ah 660A (EN) just over 1/2 the price of an Australian made Q-85. Got 6.5 years out of original from Japan 2019 using stop start most of the time.

Pros: 6.5 years of use
Part number: Q85/115D23L
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Varta Battery

Varta’dan vazgecmeyin. Zamaninda bahsettiginiz markalari kullandim 2 yil sonrasinda yolda kaldim. Kendi aracimdaki aku de Varta.

Pros: Varta en iyisi
Cons: yolda kaldim
Vehicle: Mercedes
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Varta Battery

Clio 2014 aracım vardı s&s lu orijinal aküsünden sonra mutlu akü kullandım memnun kalmadım şuan Varta kullanıyorum çok memnunum ben yerinde olsam risk almam vartadan devam ederim

Pros: Varta çok memnunum
Cons: mutlu akü memnun kalmadım
Vehicle: Renault Clio
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
OEM Mazda Battery

2014 Mazda 3 with 322,000 kms, it's doing fine. I'm still on original engine, transmission and starter. I use it almost daily in traffic. The only problem is that the battery is slightly more costly than a standard one, which offsets the miniscule fuel savings you're getting from the system

Pros: original engine, transmission, starter
Cons: battery is slightly more costly
Vehicle: Mazda 3
Mileage: 322000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
OEM Mazda Battery
chronomagnus
  • Indicator:
Rating 3.0

My battery conked out at the normal time after 6 years. But it still didn’t give me any warning that it was dying. 2019 Mazda 3 here

Pros: lasted 6 years
Cons: no warning before dying
Vehicle: Mazda 3
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
OEM Mazda Battery

My brother and I both have/had 6 speed 2015 Mazda3 (me the hatchback, him the sedan), and both of us had terrible issues with the Mazda brand batteries.

Cons: terrible issues
Vehicle: Mazda
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
OEM Mazda Battery

These are excellent cars but for some reason the batteries they use are bad. I had a 21 Mazda 3. The battery failed in 2023. They replaced it under warranty. The new battery lasted literally less than 6 months.

Cons: poor quality, short lifespan
Vehicle: Mazda 3
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 13

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons

Which battery to choose — OEM Mazda or Varta?

If choosing battery across many manufacturers, check the part ranking. If your choice is down to two brands, the PartReview part comparisons help.

We compare battery across these categories:

Comparison of battery OEM Mazda and Varta
  1. PR Score.
  2. Overall ranking.
  3. Vote balance.
  4. Average rating.
  5. Number of reviews.
  6. Feature ratings.
  7. Car owners’ choice.

Which battery are better — Varta or OEM Mazda?

In March 2026 on PartReview, battery Varta were overall better than OEM Mazda.

  1. OEM Mazda received a PR Score of 26 out of 100, and Varta scored 84 points.
  2. OEM Mazda ranked 28 in the overall ranking, and Varta ranked 2.
  3. The average rating is higher for Varta (4.2) than for OEM Mazda (1.9).
  4. Battery Varta have better feature ratings than OEM Mazda:
    • Cranking - owners believe, that this property for Varta is better than OEM Mazda.
    • Lights - drivers claim, that this property for Varta is outperforms OEM Mazda.
    • Indicator - reviews suggest, that this property for Varta is preferred to OEM Mazda.

Which battery are more popular — OEM Mazda or Varta?

In March 2026 on PartReview, battery Varta were overall more popular than OEM Mazda.

By vote balance, battery Varta surpassed OEM Mazda:

  • For OEM Mazda, the ratio of positive (31) to negative (85) votes is -54 votes.
  • For Varta, the ratio of positive (226) to negative (40) votes is 186 votes.

By number of reviews, battery Varta surpassed OEM Mazda:

  • For battery OEM Mazda there are 38 reviews: 9 positive, 2 neutral, 27 negative.
  • For battery Varta there are 87 reviews: 72 positive, 5 neutral, 10 negative.

Which battery do car owners prefer — OEM Mazda or Varta?

In March 2026, according to PartReview, battery Varta led more car-specific ratings than OEM Mazda:

Varta are chosen by owners of cars such as: Mazda 3, and others.

Battery OEM Mazda have not yet taken leading positions in car-specific ratings. You can help by adding a review and specifying your car.

Other comparisons of battery

If this comparison didn’t fully answer your question, there are many others on PartReview.

For example, comparisons of battery OEM Mazda with: OPTIMA, Bosch, OEM Subaru, OEM Volkswagen, YUASA, Tesla, Duralast, Exide, OEM BMW, Deka.

Also available: comparisons of battery Varta with: OPTIMA, Bosch, OEM Subaru, OEM Volkswagen, YUASA, Tesla, Duralast, Exide, OEM BMW, Deka.

You can also see who is better among other battery manufacturers: OPTIMA or Varta, OPTIMA or Bosch, OPTIMA or OEM Subaru, OPTIMA or OEM Volkswagen, OPTIMA or YUASA.

Loading...