Tires

Owner reviews for tires

Manufacturers
BRIDGESTONE Tires

I ran Bridgestone Duravis R238 on my 43' Cyclone when I owned it. Zero issues, it's a heavy LT highway rib tire

Pros: zero issues
Part number: R238
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken Tires

Update after driving to, on and back from the track - The grip is much greater than stock Hankooks, was a wet day but I still found the grip to be quite impressive. The brakes stayed cool without any signs of fade or losing brake feel.

Pros: grip is much greater
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Vredestein Tires

I use Vredstein Hitrac All-season on my 2023 Camry Hybrid. Barely hit my fuel efficiency, maybe .5%. But waaayyyyy better performance is rain and snow compared to my OEM firestones.

Pros: better performance in rain/snow
Cons: wear rate might not be best
Mileage: 10000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
OEM Audi Tires

Hab im letzten Jahr meinen 91er Audi 100 C4 mit 120tkm wieder fit gemacht, den ich 2007 weg gestellt hatte. Wären also knapp 18 Jahre.

Vorbereitungen:

- Alte Reifen drauf, die sind danach eh hin.

Vehicle: Audi 100
Mileage: 120000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
COMFORSER Tires
Ok_Rub3732
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 4.0

Id suggest learning ro drive better honestly. Comforser tyres are made in China by a Canadian company and are extremely reliable and cost effective.

Independently tested they are quieter than most and have excellent rating in wet conditions. We fit Comforser CF1100 on our landrover and they perform better than most other tyres in the most challenging conditions.

Pros: reliable and cost effective
Vehicle: Land Rover
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
NANKANG Tires

I have them ony C5. They're actually not bad even when not up to temp. I just don't push them hard until I build some heat. On the street they're AOK as long as youre not stupid.

Pros: not bad even cold
Cons: push hard when cold
Vehicle: Chevrolet
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken Tires
Hemlock_999
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 3.0

Mine are finished and I've driven them exactly 30k miles.. I've regularly had them rotated, and I kept them inflated as required. Their warranty is pure BS (as any sign of uneven ware voids it). They're decent tires, you just need to know what you're getting before you pull the trigger.

Pros: decent tires
Cons: warranty is pure BS
Mileage: 48280 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Pirelli Tires

The "high performance" Perelli's that came with my Mustang GT became useless lumps of rock hard rubber at any temperature below 40F, despite being all-seasons. It was bad enough to be a significant driving hazard even on completely dry tarmac. Quickly switched out for Michelins.

Cons: driving hazard, rock hard
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Pirelli Tires

Pirelli PZeros came stock on my Mustang GT and they were awful. They used to break loose all the time, I thought about trading the car in the first year because it handled like shit. Then I found a screaming deal on a set of Michelin Pilot Sports so I swapped them at 9000 miles. Night and day difference, it’s like a different car now.

Cons: awful, break loose
Mileage: 9000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source

Write your review about tires

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Loading...