Reviews of Kumho tires

PR Score ? Shows the percentage of positive votes. Learn more in the help

Based on

421 reviews and 1326 votes

1326 votes

Average rating ? The average rating is calculated only from review ratings, without votes
3.7
Ride comfort:
3.4
Noise:
3.9
Grip:
3.5

421 review

Description
Kumho
South Korea
Rank #14

among 66 manufacturers

Share:
Kumho Tires
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 5.0

I switched my '25 Turbo to the Kumho Crugen HP71's and am very happy with the increased sound insulation and performance. Much better in rain than the Toyos I had (which developed a giant bump on the side wall 3k miles in).

Pros: increased sound insulation
Cons: Toyos developed bump
Mileage: 3000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho Tires
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 5.0

This is new release from Kumho, so reviews were sparse with the exception of one from Germany. I have about 500 mi on the tires, they are awesome! I can get traction now WOT in 1st, they have a stiffer sidewall which makes them responsive and planted in corners. Further, the ride is quiet and smooth which is important to me for a DD.

Pros: responsive, planted in corners
Vehicle: Volkswagen
Mileage: 805 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho Tires

I've had the previous Kumho Ecsta Sport on a different car for budgetary reasons. They were great for a few months, but I felt like they lost a ton of grip after 10k miles or so. Longevity was my only complaint, but it was for my daily so even without a ton of grip, I'd consider them a good buy for value.

Pros: good buy for value
Cons: lost grip after 10k
Mileage: 16093 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho Tires

I have the same year and trim and tires. Just went in today for the 30K check (30,500 miles), and I have 5/32 on the front, 2/32 on the back. I am planning on changing all four now, just debating which tires to get. I'll probably get the Kumho Crugen's again, as they seemed really quiet.

Pros: seemed really quiet
Vehicle: Volkswagen
Mileage: 30500 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho Tires

My experience with Kumho was once the top layer of the tire wore off (e.g. after a year), performance of the tire degraded. They must use a cheaper rubber underneath.

Cons: performance degraded after wear
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho Tires

After blowing out a tire on a particularly nasty pothole I replaced my stockers with a set of Kumho Ecsta PA51 XLs. These are a nice, reasonably priced set of ultra-high performance all seasons that I'd been running on my MR2 Turbo and been very happy with.

Pros: nice, reasonably priced
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho Tires

Mine are 7 years old and the best tires shop in my town said that I still have 10-12k miles left on them. I decided to replace with the exact same ones though, since my car sits in FL sun whole days. They are excellent.

Pros: excellent tires
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho Tires

The HA32 has pretty OK performance for an all-weather tire, it placed mostly in the middle of the pack in this review. Wet braking performance is a little behind the competition.

Pros: OK performance
Cons: wet braking behind
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ... 42

Write your review about tires Kumho

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other tires
Loading...