Reviews of BRIDGESTONE tires

PR Score ? Shows the percentage of positive votes. Learn more in the help

Based on

915 reviews and 2843 votes

2843 votes

Average rating ? The average rating is calculated only from review ratings, without votes
3.9
Grip:
4.0
Noise:
3.5
Ride comfort:
3.4

915 reviews

Description
BRIDGESTONE
Japan
Rank #5

among 66 manufacturers

Share:
BRIDGESTONE Tires

my buddy just picked up ws70's for his 2011 wrx. yesterday we went for a ride up the mountains and both of us where dissapointed in the ws70's. There was no snow or ice, but we did hit wet/damp roads and the ws70's where very squirmy in the corners. they sort of understeer then snap and oversteer. I wouldnt suggest them if she does any sort of spirited driving.

Cons: very squirmy, understeer then oversteer
Vehicle: Subaru
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

For example, Maxxis MA-Z1's cost me $135ea and last about 30,000kms, but the Bridgestone Adrenalin RE001's on my car at the moment can get about 60-80,000kms, but cost $185ea.

Pros: can get 60-80,000kms
Cons: more expensive
Vehicle: Ford Focus
Mileage: 60000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

I had the WS-50 on my Miata (came with it) and they were fanfukintastic in snow and ice but lasted about 20,000 miles total before turning into slippy dangerous banana peels while still showing 6/32 remaining.

Pros: fanfukintastic in snow, ice
Cons: slippy dangerous banana peels
Vehicle: Mazda
Mileage: 20000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

Last winter I made the switch from studded Pirelli Winter Carvings to studless Bridgestone Blizzak WS60s... I was extremely impressed with them. Worked great in the white stuff.

Pros: worked great
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

I loved the 960's I had on my mkV GTI. I thought they were a great replacement for the RE050's that came stock on the car. I thought the grip on the dry was very similar between the two, but the 960's were better when the weather got bad--as well as lasting longer.

Pros: great replacement, better grip
Vehicle: Volkswagen
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

FWIW, my WRX came with a set of the Bridgestones when I bought it. I had zero problems running year-round, and we get some snow here.

Pros: zero problems year-round
Vehicle: Subaru
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

I've experienced the Bridgestones on my Volvo for nearly two years, and am fairly impressed with their performance... for an all-season. Dry grip is great and treadwear is respectable.

Pros: dry grip is great
Vehicle: Volvo
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 5.0

Here's what a 245/40-17 Bridgestone RE11 looks like after 18mths on the R - over 200 autox runs and 8k street miles. I run 40-44 PSI hot on a well setup car. Note that there's minimal indication of excessive scrub or rollover. These tires are wearing great and were good enough for top pax time in a 60 car field at a recent local event

Pros: wearing great, top pax time
Cons: none
Vehicle: Volkswagen
Mileage: 12875 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 ... 92

Write your review about tires BRIDGESTONE

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other tires
Popular BRIDGESTONE parts
Loading...