Reviews of BRIDGESTONE tires

PR Score ? Shows the percentage of positive votes. Learn more in the help

Based on

915 reviews and 2843 votes

2843 votes

Average rating ? The average rating is calculated only from review ratings, without votes
3.9
Grip:
4.0
Noise:
3.5
Ride comfort:
3.4

915 reviews

Description
BRIDGESTONE
Japan
Rank #5

among 66 manufacturers

Share:
BRIDGESTONE Tires

I just got some Bridgestone DESTINATION LE3. They’re holding up really well so far, a lot better than my stock tires.

Pros: holding up really well
Cons: better than stock tires
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

On my old M3, I used Bridgestone quiettracks .- they had an 80,000 mile warranty, and I only paid full price once:-).

Pros: 80,000 mile warranty
Vehicle: BMW
Mileage: 80000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 5.0

Couldn't find Michelin Pilot Alpin 5s in the size I needed so I tried the new Bridgestone Blizzak 6s and so far I'm very happy with them. Super stable on dry highways, Michelin X-Ice Snows were a wobbly mess that made me feel like I was in a boat.

Pros: Super stable on dry highways
Cons: Michelin X-Ice Snows wobbly
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

I'm now on my 3rd winter on Blizzaks because Costco had a deal on them at the time and I thought I'd give them a try. I find them similar, but probably better from the standpoint that I used to be able to spin the X-Ices too easily taking off from a light in slippery conditions, and I can't say that I've noticed that issue as much with the Blizzaks.

Pros: better in slippery conditions
Vehicle: Volkswagen
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

For price and performance bridgestone blizzak dmv2. Hands down. You will have a different kind of confidence driving in that crap. Its night and day

Pros: different kind of confidence
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

OEM Bridgestone Alenza tires are known to be trash and the rears were completely done by ~17k miles. I have ~37k miles on the Michelin CrossClimates and the rears probably have another 20k left in them, fronts have another 30-40k left in them.

Pros: Michelin tires last longer
Cons: OEM tires are trash, short lifespan
Vehicle: Volkswagen
Mileage: 54000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

I drove from Halifax to vancouver island BC during the first week of Jan 2025, and it wasnt too bad. I have a 2018 ford f250 with 4x4 and bridgestone blizzak snow tires, and it was fine.

Pros: good snow tires
Vehicle: Ford
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires
  • Grip:
Rating 3.0

I've used Nokians for years but tried Blizzak WS-90s this time around because they were a fair bit less expensive. They seem fine but seem to have noticeably more rolling resistance than the Nokian, and I notice it's easier to spin them starting up on dry pavement in cold weather than I'd experienced with Nokian in the past. I'll be switching back to whatever Hakkapeliitta is current once these are worn out.

Pros: less expensive
Cons: more rolling resistance
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.5

For Illinois daily driving, I\u2019d go with the Bridgestone WeatherPeak out of the three you listed it\u2019s been the most consistent in wet + light-snow grip and rides smoother than the Contis or the BFGs. I swapped to WeatherPeaks earlier this year and they\u2019ve handled Midwest rain and early flurries way better than my old set.

Pros: consistent wet, snow grip
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 ... 92

Write your review about tires BRIDGESTONE

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other tires
Popular BRIDGESTONE parts
Loading...