Tires YOKOHAMA or Nokia

YOKOHAMA Tires

I can't speak for the stretch as I have them on my stock bugatti's but the S.Drives are an extremely nice tire (at least for regular street driving). Got them on a couple months ago and love them. Wet and dry performance has been outstanding.

Pros: Wet and dry performance outstanding
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires

S.Drives NO QUESTION!!! I have had both. . . I will NEVER run those garbage falkens again. im running 195/40 16's on my 9's as we speak and they are 100% exactly what I have been looking for in a tire. the falkens were 100% opposite.

Pros: exactly what I have been looking for
Cons: falkens suck in EVERY way
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires

From personal expierence, the s.drives are a better tire, stretch slightly less but are a far better tire. the 512s are just good for stretching and thats about it.

Pros: better tire
Cons: stretch slightly less
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires
koston.
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 5.0

A little spendier, but absolutely love my Yokohama S.Drives in 205/50/15. Best tires I've driven, hands down. They outperform the Dunlops in every condition, are queiter and stiffer sidewalls, don't squeal etc...

Pros: best tires, quieter
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires
Froster
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 4.5

I just picked up a set of Yokohama TRZ's for my wifes Golf, as they seemed to be a good all-around choice. She's had them a couple weeks now and they have been great. They feel great in the dry and in the wet, and are much quieter than the OEM Goodyears that they replaced.

Pros: feel great in dry, wet
Cons: require more frequent replacement
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

I ended up going onto the Nokian website and searched around for the right snow tires for an EV. They actually have them. They have them up to a 99 load rating which is much better than the 95s I had. Made a huge difference in handling...

Pros: huge difference in handling
Vehicle: Volkswagen
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

I too was running Nokian Haks and it was almost uncanny how good the traction was not just in deep fresh but on compacted snow and ice. The EV is a very heavy vehicle and having 2/3 the weight (depending on cargo) over the drive wheels makes a very stable setup.

Pros: good traction, stable setup
Cons: load rating tough to find
Vehicle: Volkswagen
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

17" of snow We just received an official 17.1" of snow so here is how my 01mv did with a set of Nokian Haks: At the end of the storm I tried to drive uphill to my house on an unplowed residential street. Made it most of the way before getting stuck - the front bumper was pushing snow.

Pros: good traction, money well spent
Cons: front bumper pushing snow
Vehicle: Volkswagen
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires
nickthaskater
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 4.0

I like Yokohama's approach: In regards to handling, the tires were not destined for track duty, so we experienced a level of performance that was slightly above the standard OE tire on most modern passenger vehicles. A few of us did the sentiment that the tire did improve its ability to stay planted after a few hot laps, which would give credence to Yokohama\u2019s claim that the special compound will change its handling characteristics for the better when driven aggressively.

Pros: improved ability to stay planted
Cons: not destined for track duty
Vehicle: MINI
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

I can echo the feelings of the dry pavement handling, coming around a corner with a bit of enthusiasm you can feel the car start to slide around. I'm sure once the snow and ice come the trade-off will be justified, but fairly unnerving in the dry to say the least.

Cons: car start to slide
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...