Tires YOKOHAMA or NITTO

YOKOHAMA Tires

Replaced with Yokohama Geolandars AT XD (GO17). Decent in the snow, and I feel as though they're better than KO2's/AT3s (owned both).

Pros: decent in the snow
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires

Yokohama Geolanders for tires. Drove another ~50 miles on packed snow roads once I hit the NMW and had zero issues with traction or sliding around.

Pros: zero issues with traction
Mileage: 80 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires

The Yoke Advan Apex 601 was a damn good tire for the price. I moved to supercar 3's and it was only slightly faster.

Pros: damn good tire
Cons: only slightly faster
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
NITTO Tires

Like mine, I’m running Nitto NT555 G2s, they have around a 30k mileage run. As opposed to Michelins Defender 2 which have an 80k mileage the compound on most daily tires should be a little harder, lasting longer.

Pros: better performance, track use
Cons: shorter mileage run
Mileage: 48000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires
Hms34
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 5.0

Just replaced a set of Yokohama Avid Ascend GTs on my Mazda3.....after 81k miles. They still had a little wear left. Treadware warranty was 65k. No recent alignment but regular rotations. Never had a flat either, on crappy New England roads.

Pros: long lasting, good wear
Vehicle: Mazda
Mileage: 129600 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
NITTO Tires

NT05 isn't great. And I hate the 555's - the orig were cheap and OK but the G2 is worse, you can do better with Firestone Indy 500's or Continental ExtremeContact both are about 300TW.

Cons: NT05 isn't great, 555's worse
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 ... 89

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...