Tires YOKOHAMA or Kumho

YOKOHAMA Tires

Put Yokohoma Advans and now being driving for 33k miles with no issues. Also has noticeably less road noise than stock Falkens.

Pros: less road noise
Vehicle: Mazda 6
Mileage: 52800 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires

Yokohama ice guard on my WRX. Does well in slush. Real good in deep snow. Wet roads very good. Dry pavement and temps above 45F, not so great.

Pros: does well in slush
Cons: not great on dry pavement
Vehicle: Subaru
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires

PS: Dont go for Falken again. I replaced mine with Yokohoma Advans and they are pretty good.

Pros: pretty good
Cons: dont go for falken
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho Tires

Highly rate Kumhos and have happily put them on anything from my daily to my high performance 4wd fun car.

Pros: highly rate Kumhos
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires
TechnicianVirtual786
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 5.0

Cheap tires are easily damaged plus they don't hold as much air pressure get the best tire you possibly can the Yokohama is actually a really heavy-duty good tire you need a really good heavy duty tire.

Pros: heavy-duty good tire
Cons: easily damaged
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho Tires
Samson
  • Noise:
Rating 3.0

The OE tires (Kumho Solus KL21) still have probably 25% of the tread remaining, so they're not in need of replacement for that reason... even though they have become pretty noisy and have a bit of feathering around the edges.

Cons: pretty noisy, feathering edges
Mileage: 64373 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 ... 96

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...