Tires YOKOHAMA or Kormoran

YOKOHAMA Tires

I got Yokohama Avids at 102k, now the van is at 130k and they still look brand new so I highly recommend Yokohamas.

Pros: look brand new
Cons: Bridgestone Ecopias don't last
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires
DragoonHimself
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

I went with the Yokohama Avid Ascend GTs. Very similar tire just higher quality than the stock. Replaced my stock Avid GTs at 46k. Up to 58k now and I can say I like them.

Pros: higher quality than stock
Vehicle: Subaru
Mileage: 46000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires
eniadcorlet
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 4.0

I have my second set of Yokohama Geolanders GO15s on my '14. The first set had inconsistent tire wear because I let them go without rotation a little too long. I replaced them at 50k. If they had worn evenly I feel I could have gotten the full 65k out of them.

The road noise and mileage are just as good as the Continentals that came stock on mine. I have that little extra grip on the gravel and dirt back roads.

Pros: extra grip, gravel and dirt
Cons: inconsistent tire wear
Vehicle: Subaru
Mileage: 50000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires

Yokohama is my choice. They tend to do very well on Hondas. They also last a long time too.

Pros: last a long time
Vehicle: Honda
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires

I am considering two options with one of them being a T rated tire. However, it has deeper treads and it is actually a known brand. I know that a T rated tire will decrease performance and safety but is it worth it over an unknown brand?

Pros: deeper treads
Cons: decrease performance, safety
Vehicle: Toyota
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 ... 56

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...