Tires YOKOHAMA or KENDA

YOKOHAMA Tires

Put Yokohoma Advans and now being driving for 33k miles with no issues. Also has noticeably less road noise than stock Falkens.

Pros: less road noise
Vehicle: Mazda 6
Mileage: 52800 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires

Yokohama ice guard on my WRX. Does well in slush. Real good in deep snow. Wet roads very good. Dry pavement and temps above 45F, not so great.

Pros: does well in slush
Cons: not great on dry pavement
Vehicle: Subaru
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires

PS: Dont go for Falken again. I replaced mine with Yokohoma Advans and they are pretty good.

Pros: pretty good
Cons: dont go for falken
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires
TechnicianVirtual786
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 5.0

Cheap tires are easily damaged plus they don't hold as much air pressure get the best tire you possibly can the Yokohama is actually a really heavy-duty good tire you need a really good heavy duty tire.

Pros: heavy-duty good tire
Cons: easily damaged
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
KENDA Tires

I had these, but the 12.5’s on my JL i traded in for the gladiator. They were good for all but ice. My jl’s stock ko2’s were far better in the snow/ice and i actually missed having them. Live in Alaska so half the year slipping around wasn’t ideal lol. Just some info for anyone looking at these tires

Pros: good for all but ice
Cons: poor performance on ice
Vehicle: Jeep
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires
Gateway1012
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 1.0

I had Yokohama’s but I’m not sure if it was my car or the tires I got were defective they kept shaking over 70 miles . I got them re balanced twice and eventually gave up and got a new set

Cons: shaking over 70 miles
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 ... 68

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...