Tires YOKOHAMA or DEBICA

DEBICA Tires

I've been using matador and debica all season tires and debica lasted longer and had better grip in bad weather conditions!

Pros: better grip, longer lasting
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires

Just changed these out in my 2017! 67k miles. I really liked them, but they were unavailable at discount tire so now I’ve got Yokohama somethings.

Pros: liked them
Cons: unavailable
Mileage: 107826 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires

If you are shopping the 235/65 17 size you can get Yokohama g015 for 160 each. They are great tires loved them on my tacoma. Now I have wrangler AT Kevlar not as good imho

Pros: great tires
Cons: wrangler AT Kevlar better
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
DEBICA Tires

Eu unul as merge pe Debica Navigator 3. Le detin de aproape de 2 ani si n-am avut probleme.

Pro : distanta de franare este foarte ok pe uscat si chiar foarte buna pe umed as zice.

Pros: foarte buna pe umed
Cons: nu sunt ok pe zapada
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires

I put G015's on my 2021 premium around January and they did not lose traction a single time through last winter in Upstate NY. Took them through the Adirondacks with ≈8" of snow on forest roads to get to a ski mtn. Great upgrade imo over the stock G91F's

Pros: great upgrade, good traction
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires

I have the Ascend LX as my summer set but I couldn't quite find a direct comparison talking about the LX compared to the GT The LX's are supposed to have been rated for 85K, but they're already at 6/32s after 25K. Other than that I haven't had much of an issue with them

Pros: no major issues
Cons: fast wear
Vehicle: Subaru
Mileage: 40233 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 ... 56

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...