Tires YOKOHAMA or BRIDGESTONE

YOKOHAMA Tires

I bought the Yokohama BlueEarth winter tires. They worked great. They also meet the traction requirements for things like mountain passes. I didn't notice any change in gas mileage. During COVID we weren't driving much so I just left them on all year and didn't have any issues.

Pros: worked great, meet traction requirements, no change in gas mileage, no issues
Vehicle: Volvo XC60
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires
SpiffyNrfHrdr
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 5.0

I've put Yokohama Advan Sport A/S on an E39, a 996, a Z4, and my current 986; I've been very happy with them every time. They're usually a little cheaper than other big name brand tires, they're quiet, and they have plenty of grip for our cars.

I took the 996 and E39 to autox and I had to really push the Yokohamas to get them to start slipping.

Pros: quiet, plenty of grip
Vehicle: BMW
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

Ja sam 2020. na taj način uzeo Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 u točno toj dimenziji, na 127k km, bile su 2400 kn, i jebi ti njima mater, još uvijek se lijepe za cestu po kakvim god uvjetima, iako ću ih nakon ove sezone vrlo vjerojatno zamijenit reda radi, budući da sam sad na 190k km.

Pros: odlično prianjanje, dugotrajne performanse
Mileage: 63000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

I was running stock Bridgestones - they’re 240 TW. They’re street tires and I don’t think I do enough track days to go w a more track oriented tire. They felt quite good on track. Not great. Good.

Pros: felt quite good
Cons: not great
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

Bridgestone Potenza RE92 are great on dry pavement; but they are a scary ride with RWD on wet, snowy, or icy pavement.

Pros: great on dry pavement
Cons: scary on wet pavement
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 ... 146

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...