Got it
We use cookies to collect statistics and improve your experience. Learn more.
Spare parts reviews ➔ All comparisons ➔ PHANTOM ➔ Barum

Tires PHANTOM or Barum

Reviews
All
PHANTOM
Barum
Barum › Tires
Gu733
  • Grip:
Rating 4.0

Le avevo 4 stagioni sulla Fiat punto del 2008, la mia prima auto.

Mi sono trovato molto bene, l'ho tenuta dal 2019 al 2022, sono andato anche sulla neve in montagna, in nevicata piena, e ho avuto zero problemi.

Pros: Mi sono trovato bene
Cons: Poi ho grippato
Vehicle: Fiat Punto
Mileage: 75000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Barum › Tires
qberserkr
  • Grip:
Rating 4.0

Avute per 4 anni su una c3. Uso misto, in ordine: collina, citt\u00e0, autostrada a velocit\u00e0 sostenuta.

In inverno nevica poco da me, ma le abbiamo testate un paio di settimane fa (vecchie di 4 anni) e siamo usciti senza problemi dal vialetto sterrato e innevato.

Pros: si sono comportate bene
Vehicle: Citroen C3
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Barum › Tires
vargemp
  • Grip:
Rating 5.0

I got new Barums for this winter and they’re doing absolutely fine (also on a Golf). Recently done 110 on snowed highway while everyone else was in the right lane doing like 80 and they felt perfectly stable. On wet road they also seem to do well.

Pros: perfectly stable, do well
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
PHANTOM › Tires
BikePlumber
  • Grip:
Rating 2.5

Some tires are made in China and some possibly(?) better ones are made Vietnam, while made in Korea tires usually aren't bad, but may not last as long as expensive tires. For safety, I wouldn't go too cheap on tires. Many cheap tires have rather poor traction when new and become unsafe with only a few miles of wear on them. The Chinese tires often are made of very hard rubber, which might wear well, but has poor traction. There may be some in between tires made in the Philippines, but I'd avoid them. Kumho is a Korean tire company with majority Chinese ownership by a Chinese tire company. They make Phantom tires, likely in China, but even in Korea, they would be the low end. Hankook tires are "better" Korean tires. Not the best, but seem safer. I'd check tire reviews on the Internet.

Pros: may wear well (hard rubber)
Cons: poor traction, not safe, avoid cheap
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
PHANTOM › Tires
cormack_gv
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 2.0

They're Chinese junk. They sorta work, but have 20% less traction and 50% less lifetime.

Pros: sorta work
Cons: less traction, less lifetime
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Barum › Tires
Justplay567
  • Grip:
Rating 1.0

Der einzige Reifen der mir mal bei 240kmh auf der Autobahn geplatzt ist war einer von Barum (wohl eine Tochtermarke von Continental) hatte damals der Vorbesitzer des Fahrzeuges gekauft und montiert

Cons: Reifen geplatzt bei 240kmh
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 2 3 4

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
VS

Tires MICHELIN or Continental

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Pirelli

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Falken

VS

Tires MICHELIN or BRIDGESTONE

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Goodyear

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Nokia

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Hankook

VS

Tires MICHELIN or YOKOHAMA

Show all

Which tires to choose — PHANTOM or Barum?

If choosing tires across many manufacturers, check the part ranking. If your choice is down to two brands, the PartReview part comparisons help.

We compare tires across these categories:

Comparison of tires PHANTOM and Barum
  1. PR Score.
  2. Overall ranking.
  3. Vote balance.
  4. Average rating.
  5. Number of reviews.
  6. Feature ratings.
  7. Car owners’ choice.

Which tires are better — Barum or PHANTOM?

In March 2026 on PartReview, tires Barum were overall better than PHANTOM.

  1. PHANTOM received a PR Score of 46 out of 100, and Barum scored 77 points.
  2. PHANTOM ranked 58 in the overall ranking, and Barum ranked 40.
  3. The average rating is higher for Barum (3.5) than for PHANTOM (2.9).
  4. Tires Barum have better feature ratings than PHANTOM:
    • Grip - owners believe, that this property for Barum is better than PHANTOM.
    • Ride comfort - drivers claim, that this property for Barum is outperforms PHANTOM.
    • Noise - reviews suggest, that this property for Barum is preferred to PHANTOM.

Which tires are more popular — PHANTOM or Barum?

In March 2026 on PartReview, tires Barum were overall more popular than PHANTOM.

By vote balance, tires Barum surpassed PHANTOM:

  • For PHANTOM, the ratio of positive (20) to negative (23) votes is -3 votes.
  • For Barum, the ratio of positive (47) to negative (14) votes is 33 votes.

By number of reviews, tires Barum surpassed PHANTOM:

  • For tires PHANTOM there are 12 reviews: 2 positive, 7 neutral, 3 negative.
  • For tires Barum there are 20 reviews: 15 positive, 1 neutral, 4 negative.

Which tires do car owners prefer — PHANTOM or Barum?

In March 2026, according to PartReview, tires PHANTOM and Barum have not taken top places in car-specific ratings. You can help by adding your review about these manufacturers.

Other comparisons of tires

If this comparison didn’t fully answer your question, there are many others on PartReview.

For example, comparisons of tires PHANTOM with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, YOKOHAMA, Toyo.

Also available: comparisons of tires Barum with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, YOKOHAMA, Toyo.

You can also see who is better among other tires manufacturers: MICHELIN or Continental, MICHELIN or Pirelli, MICHELIN or Falken, MICHELIN or BRIDGESTONE, MICHELIN or Goodyear.

Loading...
›