Tires OEM Mazda or BFGoodrich

BFGoodrich Tires
bromontana9
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

I currently have both. K02s on my taco and wildpeaks on my 4runner. I like the wildpeaks much more. The wildpeaks perform better in the snow and are quieter on pavement. They are also significantly cheaper. I've had endless balancing issues with the k02s. They ride a little harsher/stiffer as well. Off road the difference between the two is minimal.

Pros: better snow, quieter, cheaper
Cons: balancing issues, harsher ride
Vehicle: Toyota
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BFGoodrich Tires
CaptLuker
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

I’ve had both. Wildpeaks on my 5th 4Runner and K02 on my Landcruiser. I prefer the look of K02 by a long shot if that matters to you. They both ride identical to me on the highway and snow honestly. They are both ATs so gonna cake up and suck in the mud.

Pros: identical ride, prefer look
Cons: suck in the mud
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BFGoodrich Tires
Rypat
  • Grip:
Rating 5.0

Haven't had Falken but I currently have KO2's on my 470. I live near Durango at 8400' and still have 3' of snow. I haven't had any complaints with these tires, on road, off-road, on snow or ice. They perform way better than Yokohama's, or Hankooks in my opinion and I will most likely get them again.

Pros: no complaints, great performance
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BFGoodrich Tires

Both great all terrains. Which means, good at most things, great at nothing. Ko2 is the standard for a reason, wildpeaks WERE the more affordable sexy new alternative. Were is the key, not much cheaper like they used to be. Still I got 40k out of mine before going back to ko2s on my gx470. Ko2 is a much better looking tire with a more unique tread pattern that works great in the snow and rain. Not so great in mud, but that’s why they make mud terrains.

Pros: better looking, unique tread
Cons: not great in mud
Vehicle: Lexus
Mileage: 40000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BFGoodrich Tires

KO2s - 50k on my 80 series and still have 8/32nds tread (roughly half way worn). Mileage warranty is 50k. Super quiet compared to other ATs I've tried.

Pros: super quiet, long lasting
Mileage: 50000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BFGoodrich Tires
badgraydog
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 5.0

Have the KO2 on my Ram 2500. Better traction than stock on wet pavement, no increase in tire noise and same fuel mileage. Would buy again.

Pros: better traction, no noise
Cons: none
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BFGoodrich Tires
too_much_covfefe_man
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 3.0

I ran some KM3 in the Cascades for a few months before they got really slashed up on sharp rocks and punctured, then 3 years on one set of KO2 without trouble.

Pros: 3 years without trouble
Cons: slashed up, punctured
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BFGoodrich Tires

I think they are both great tires. I will say my personal experience with KO2’s was less than stellar but I have buddies who love them. Mine were annoyingly noisy when turning, I ended up replacing them with wildpeaks and have been really happy with them.

Pros: happy with wildpeaks
Cons: noisy when turning
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 ... 35

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...