Tires OEM Audi or Nokia

Nokia Tires
tatecg
  • Noise:
Rating 4.0

I put these, in this size, on my R1S— they seem great so far (2 weeks). Maybe a little more road noise?

Pros: seem great so far
Cons: little more road noise
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

I had them on an 2015 Accord sedan for four+ years(7/8 months per year), fantastic tires unfortunately I cannot attest to snow as I switch over to Hakkapeliitta 9 in Mid November as we have a Winter Tire Law in Quebec Canada. They are very good on the wet, great on dry, not particularly loud and wear relatively well but tire pressure and one good alignment a year is a must in Montreal with the fluctuations in Temperature and pot holes in the spring/summer...

Pros: very good on wet, great on dry
Cons: alignment a must
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires
Adept-Sky-1715
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

My wife wanted a tire that was more comfortable, quieter, and had better treadwear than the OEM summer tires. So far, we're really happy with these tires.

Even though there's no acoustic foam like on our OEM tires, they're quieter. They're practically silent up to 50mph but there's a slight hum at freeway speeds. They're not as loud as the OEM Continentals.

They're also much more comfortable than the OEM summer tires. With the Ohlins suspension and OEM Continentals, the Polestar 2 was surprisingly jarring over small bumps on the road. One thing that I noticed was that the Nokian sidewalls seem to be pretty soft/flexible.

Tread life should be solid. Handling/Performance feels like 85% of the OEM tires.

All in all, these aren't track tires. Nor are they the sportiest tires in the UHP All-Season class. But they're a super practical choice for a wide range of coupes and sedans - they should wear well, they're comfortable, and provide enough grip to have fun.

Pros: quieter, more comfortable, good grip
Cons: softer and more vague
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

I'm proud I bought Nokian winter tires few years ago. They weren't that expensive, about €75 each considering Continental were something like €120 each.

Pros: good price
Cons: Continental more expensive
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

I put them on a Model 3 and to me I don't feel like there's anything the CC2's can do significantly better that would justify being 40% more expensive than the WRG5's.

Pros: good tire, averages well
Cons: tradeoffs with other tires
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

the new set of Nokian Hakkapeliitta winter tires turned it into quite the beast in the snow and ice. I'm usually on the roads early before the plow and haven't gotten stuck or felt I couldn't continue because of the conditions.

Pros: excellent in snow and ice, never stuck
Vehicle: Ford Escape
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

Hey I know this thread is old, but I just discovered Hakkapeliittas and I'm planning to get those for next winter (start saving now). Just wondering is it still good without the studs? I live in Calgary Alberta.

Vehicle: Subaru
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires
secondarycontrol
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 3.0

When I transition from my summer tires (Pilot Sports) to my winter (Nokian R3), it feels like I'm driving on springs. Lotsa sway and movement.

Cons: lotsa sway and movement
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires
ThirdeYe1337
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 2.0

I had a set of Ones on my Civic for a short period but swapped them to Continental True Contact Tour 54 instead as they had some very weird vibration and wandering issues.

Cons: weird vibration, wandering issues
Vehicle: Honda Civic
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 ... 72

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...