Tires Nokia or TIGAR

Nokia Tires
Jaymorz
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 4.0

I've had the Nokian WRG models for the past 10 years and there's always been a song and dance with each model I tried. The WRG3 were excellent in the snow but the treadwear and dry performance was average (Enough for my driving needs, however). The WRG4 were slightly worse in the snow compared to the WRG4 (Still decent) but leaps better in dry performance and rain. The problem with the WRG4 was the susceptibility to dry rot and overall "wear" from normal driving. They have been punctured, misshapen, and suffered "premature" treadwear compared to what was advertised as the expected tread-life of the tire. But given how well they perform in my 4-season climate state, I would rate them highly. Tire noise is minimal, performance all around is outstanding, and minimal diminishing of performance through treadwear.

Pros: minimal tire noise, outstanding performance
Cons: susceptible to dry rot, premature wear
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

From my experience, Nokian makes the best winter tires. Once you use winter tires on slush, ice and snow, you will never go back to all season tires in winter. With AWD, it's more about being able to turn and brake in slippery conditions than getting started.

Pros: best for slush, ice, snow; good turning, braking
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires
vwbugstuff
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 3.5

As for the WRG2's - had them for less than two years. Rotated every 6500 miles. Very noisy starting at 18,000 miles and down to the bottom wear bars after 23,000 miles. There was no way they were going to make it through another winter. No treadwear warranty from Nokian. The Entyres are quiet and the ride & handling are very good. I only wish they had just a tad more grip in the Chicago snow, but overall I'm very happy with them.

Pros: quiet, good ride & handling
Cons: noisy, wore out quickly
Mileage: 23000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

Got mine a few weeks ago. Can't say I'm crazy about them. I drive a Prius Prime. On stock tires I got about 95+mpg(summer) on my 120mi daily commute. When I got G4, I was getting ~85mpg(summer). When I got G5, it dropped to about 75mpg(now). With just the gas engine, I got about 55mpg on stock tires, ~49 on G4, and something like ~45mpg or a bit higher on G5. I know new tires are generally more draggy. But this kind of number is still concerning, even though G5 has certified low rolling resistance and G4 didn't

Pros: low rolling resistance
Cons: decreased MPG
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 ... 72

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...