Tires Nokia or Sava

Nokia Tires

Honestly, if you have the option to get the Nokian Hakkas I would grab those. I had Nokian Haakas when I had my Golf about 8 years ago for 4 winters in Montreal. I used to drive to the mountains to go snowboarding with my daughter on weekends at the cottage and never had an issue with driving. We get ice, dumps of snow, slush and just about everything you can get in a winter season that always seems to last forever. Looooooved the Haakas.

Pros: never had an issue
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

For a guy who lives in Finnish coast. We used Nokian since it is local, but other brands and models that I often see are Michelin X Ice and Michelin studded tyre variant, Continental Viking Contact or its studded variant, lastly Goodyear Ultragrip Ice or its studded variant.

Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires
acejavelin69
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 4.0

My work van has the Nokian Remedy WR G5 after coming off of Toyo Celsius (yeah, never going down the Toyo road again with a passenger all-weather tire, at least in the foreseeable future), so far they have been solid and performed well this fall, much quieter and more stable than the Toyos...

Pros: much quieter, more stable
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

Im a high mileage driver 80k per year for work driving across Canadian Prairies and into Rocky mountains and I take the Nokian R5 every winter. You get -40 black ice roads with high cross winds in a tall minivan and never hit the ditch or gotten into accident with them. Handles deep snow with 0 issues too.

Pros: Handles deep snow, high mileage
Mileage: 80000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

i run 195/60R16 Nokian Haakepelittas for winter and brother let me tell YOU, i'm very cautious about when i get into VTEC while driving on dry asphalt with them.

Pros: good for winter
Cons: cautious on dry asphalt
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

I have just over 6500 miles on my set of Nokian nAT LT275/65/20s. Echoing some of the other replies here... I've had the opposite experience and for me, overall they have performed simply better than the OEM Pirellis.

Pros: quieter on the road
Cons: gobble up pebbles
Mileage: 6500 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

I have the opposite experience. 4,000 miles on the tires so far and my efficiency is *better* than the Pirellis by about 5%. They are better off-road, handle the sand dunes better than Pirellis

Pros: better off-road, better efficiency
Mileage: 4000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

You can take a bigger hit in tires alone. For instance, on my stock ContiProContacts, I average 27 mpg with 235/50r18 tires. Same size but with Nokian Z-line A/S, a tire that grips the road much better wet and dry, I'm lucky to hit 25 mpg, usually more like 22 mpg.

Pros: grips road much better
Cons: lower fuel economy
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires
iCutWaffles
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 1.0

I know this thread is 2 years old, but I have Nordman 7 on my 22 kona ev, and the grip is terrible. I have owned Hakkas on all my cars including subarus and they were top tier, on this car they don't grip for some reason.

The cabin noise is driving me crazy too, sort of excited to finish winter, and it ain't even started yet to be able to change them next year.

Cons: terrible grip, crazy cabin noise
Vehicle: Hyundai
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 ... 73

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...