Tires Nokia or PHANTOM

Nokia Tires
throwaway007676
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 5.0

I have the Nokian Ones on one of my cars and they have been excellent. I have about 35k or so on them now and they are just below the 85% mark that is on them. Quiet, smooth, great in all weather including snow and ice.

Pros: quiet, smooth, great in weather
Mileage: 35000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires
thisiswhoagain
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 5.0

I went Nokian Tyres One, and not from Costco. V-rated, Aramid reinforced sidewalls for pothole damage protection, and low rolling resistance

Pros: pothole damage protection
Cons: low rolling resistance
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

The Wetproof 1 is a co-agreement with another manufacturer to make the tire to Nokians spec, Nokian are happy with the performance of it

Pros: happy with performance
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires
frbz
  • Grip:
Rating 5.0

I am using them also. They are as good as the Nokian Hakapellitas I had and cheaper too.

Pros: good performance, cheaper price
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

Had a set on my Volvo. They were good in the winter, but only okay in the summer, and they met an early demise on a gravel road in the Sangres

Pros: good winter performance
Cons: okay summer performance
Vehicle: Volvo
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires
Shockwave179
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 1.0

Hope you have a better experience with the Outpost AT’s than I did. Just pulled them off my WK2 Grand Cherokee and disposed of them after 15K. Either way had substantial cracking and dry-rotting in-between treadblocks and violent shaking that went away with new Destination AT2’s.

Cons: cracking and dry-rotting, violent shaking
Mileage: 15000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 ... 72

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...