Tires Nokia or Maxxis

Nokia Tires

All you need is good studded tires like Nokian and you will be fine.

Pros: good studded tires
Cons: sound proofing lacking
Vehicle: Mazda
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

I\u2019ve run studded Nokians exclusively now for years. Never going back. What you give up in dry traction you more that make up for on those super hard packed icy days. Especially if you\u2019re running on the highways frequently.

Pros: good on icy days
Cons: less dry traction
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

Studded all the way! Had Hakkas on my RAV4 and they made such a difference. They can save your life on black ice.

Pros: made such a difference
Cons: slide on dry asphalt
Vehicle: Toyota
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires
76Espada
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 3.0

Had Michelin X-ice on my A3, didn’t like them in snow over 3”. Switched to Nokian hakkas, much better in snow but a lot noisier.

Pros: much better in snow
Cons: noisy
Vehicle: Audi A3
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires
Cute_Doughnuts_77
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 1.0

I have less than 25K on these tires. The tread is greater than 8/32 and I thought the cracking was part of the tread pattern. Then I noticed the tire was starting to flake apart on the tread.

I just had them replaced. I paid $800 for these tires 3 years ago. When they were sold to me they were already 1 year old. I called Nokian and they helped me find a shop that would support the warranty. The shop I bought them from would not provide any warranty support at all. This is also the shop that convinced me Nokian are good tires. I wish I had known. So frustrated that I just spend another bucket of money after 25k miles.

Pros: Nokian helped find warranty
Cons: tires flaking apart
Mileage: 40233 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 ... 90

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...