Tires Nokia or Kleber

Nokia Tires

I had Nokians on my 3, and I livelive in Wisconsin, where they handled the snow and ice, and loved their performance.

Pros: handled snow and ice
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

When I lived in Michigan I usually had Nokian tires on. They make great snow tires and I think their all weather tires preform better in the snow than most brands.

Pros: great snow tires
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires
tatecg
  • Noise:
Rating 4.0

I put these, in this size, on my R1S— they seem great so far (2 weeks). Maybe a little more road noise?

Pros: seem great so far
Cons: little more road noise
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kleber Tires

Die Reifen sind dot 31/24 und Ganzjahresreifen von Kleber Quadraxer, habe die über CHECK24 mit Reifenmontage bei ATU und Reifenversicherung (hat 30€ für alle reifen bis 2029) gekauft. Über letzteres bin ich doch Recht dankbar.

Pros: Reifenversicherung ist gut
Vehicle: Citroen C4
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kleber Tires

I tried Kleber Quadraxer 3rd gen for 2 years. The tires were perfect on hot road in Toscana in july and on ice/snow covered road in the slowenien alps in january after 30.000 km. I was fully surprised.

Pros: perfect on hot road
Mileage: 30000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

I had them on an 2015 Accord sedan for four+ years(7/8 months per year), fantastic tires unfortunately I cannot attest to snow as I switch over to Hakkapeliitta 9 in Mid November as we have a Winter Tire Law in Quebec Canada. They are very good on the wet, great on dry, not particularly loud and wear relatively well but tire pressure and one good alignment a year is a must in Montreal with the fluctuations in Temperature and pot holes in the spring/summer...

Pros: very good on wet, great on dry
Cons: alignment a must
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

The Nokian One Tires are marked as a low rolling resistance tire and I decided to give them a try. I drove a 14 mile loop with my old Michelin MXM4's at 35 MPH and then drove the same loop with the new Nokian One's. The Nokian tires had about 13% higher Watt-Hour per Mile consumption.

Pros: low rolling resistance tire
Cons: higher Watt-Hour consumption
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 ... 74

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...