Tires Nokia or KENDA

KENDA Tires
Chuckleheaded_Dimwit
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

I decided to give the Kenda K270s a shot and first impression was that they're not great on street, braking is much worse compared to the shinkos and I got a bit of wobble/instability over 65mph. Finally got to try them on dirt and WOW. They are incredible on the trail. Very confidence inspiring compared to the shinkos.

Pros: incredible on the trail
Cons: worse braking, instability
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
KENDA Tires
segoii
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 4.0

I am using the Kenda Wintergen 2 on a Mazda CX3 and it's good. Way more silent than the original Toyo R52 summer tires. And it's okay in the wet too. I'm driving it the 4th year now and they are definitely not worse than the Toyos in the wet.

Pros: more silent than Toyo
Vehicle: Mazda
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

I had them on an 2015 Accord sedan for four+ years(7/8 months per year), fantastic tires unfortunately I cannot attest to snow as I switch over to Hakkapeliitta 9 in Mid November as we have a Winter Tire Law in Quebec Canada. They are very good on the wet, great on dry, not particularly loud and wear relatively well but tire pressure and one good alignment a year is a must in Montreal with the fluctuations in Temperature and pot holes in the spring/summer...

Pros: very good on wet, great on dry
Cons: alignment a must
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires
Adept-Sky-1715
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

My wife wanted a tire that was more comfortable, quieter, and had better treadwear than the OEM summer tires. So far, we're really happy with these tires.

Even though there's no acoustic foam like on our OEM tires, they're quieter. They're practically silent up to 50mph but there's a slight hum at freeway speeds. They're not as loud as the OEM Continentals.

They're also much more comfortable than the OEM summer tires. With the Ohlins suspension and OEM Continentals, the Polestar 2 was surprisingly jarring over small bumps on the road. One thing that I noticed was that the Nokian sidewalls seem to be pretty soft/flexible.

Tread life should be solid. Handling/Performance feels like 85% of the OEM tires.

All in all, these aren't track tires. Nor are they the sportiest tires in the UHP All-Season class. But they're a super practical choice for a wide range of coupes and sedans - they should wear well, they're comfortable, and provide enough grip to have fun.

Pros: quieter, more comfortable, good grip
Cons: softer and more vague
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

I'm proud I bought Nokian winter tires few years ago. They weren't that expensive, about €75 each considering Continental were something like €120 each.

Pros: good price
Cons: Continental more expensive
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

Just wait until you try the Nokian Hakkapeliitta or Gislaved Nordfrost and realize that Blizzaks are mediocre at best.

Pros: mediocre at best
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 ... 84

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...