Tires NITTO or BFGoodrich

BFGoodrich Tires

I went with the G-Force Comp-2 A/S and paid something like $703 after installation, which also included a road hazard warranty. I found a really good deal and could have gotten some alternatives even cheaper, but the tire was the highest ranked in its category on TireRack. No regrets with the purchase, as these tires significantly outperform the Continental OEMs.

Pros: significantly outperform Continental OEMs
Vehicle: Mazda 3
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
NITTO Tires
shortybdub
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 5.0

I actually had a few sets of the Gen 1 Exit 555 Nittos and felt they were an extremely underated tire. Awesome grip, even when cold, wore like iron, and handled wet conditions like it was child's play.

Pros: awesome grip, wore like iron
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BFGoodrich Tires

I run 255/40-17 tires on all four corners of my Honda S2000 track day car. I wanted to be able to use those on the R, so I had Adaptec make custom adapters: 15mm thick in front, 25mm thick for the rear. On them I have a set of Hankook RS-3s 255/40-17, a set of Nitto NT01s (same size) and a set of BFG Comp 2 A/S 245/45-17 (my all season go anywhere tires used on the R as a daily driver). I am at stock ride height and none of these tires ever rub.

Pros: no rubbing at all
Vehicle: Honda S2000
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
NITTO Tires

I went with the neo gens (205/40) they do stretch good however the sidewall is noticeable bigger than the 195/40 federal.

Pros: stretch good
Cons: sidewall is bigger
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 ... 68

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...