Got it
We use cookies to collect statistics and improve your experience. Learn more.
Spare parts reviews ➔ All comparisons ➔ Nexen ➔ YOKOHAMA

Tires Nexen or YOKOHAMA

Reviews
All
Nexen
YOKOHAMA
YOKOHAMA › Tires
flowopmit
  • Grip:
Rating 5.0

Since you’re dedicating this set purely for HPDE and want something that survives endurance-style sessions without overheating or chunking, the Yokohama Advan Neova AD09 is the best pick among everything you listed. It holds grip longer than PS4S, it’s far more heat-resistant than the Continental Sport 02, and unlike the RT660, it doesn’t fall off a cliff halfway through a session. Perfect match for a VA STI on stock power and mild camber.

Pros: holds grip longer
Cons: price is high
Vehicle: Subaru
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA › Tires
Ahshan_7789
  • Grip:
Rating 5.0

I still miss my 360,000 mile Gen 3 Prius. I took really good care of it. Imported Japanese brand new hybrid battery , new catalytic converter, brand new Yokohama tires all around with brake pads and discs just to get rammed by a drunk driver.

Pros: good care, new parts
Cons: totaled by drunk driver
Mileage: 579365 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA › Tires
SaltSkull87
  • Grip:
Rating 5.0

Yokohama, because the CEAT tires that came with my Hunter slip on the grooves of the streets, but I tried a Triumph 400 with Yokohamas and the grip is exceptional.

Pros: exceptional grip
Cons: CEAT tires slip
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA › Tires
flipu2k
  • Grip:
Rating 4.0

Eu am AT-uri all season (yokohama geolandar g015), foarte multumit. Am fost si la schi iarna asta, drumuri necuratate, n-am avut probleme. La franare pe zapada parca lasa putin de dorit, dar nici michelin-urile vechi de iarna nu erau grozave.

Pros: foarte multumit, n-am avut probleme
Cons: franare lasa de dorit
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nexen › Tires
ktmrider119z
  • Grip:
Rating 3.0

24 sport 6mt with the stock nfera au7. It does fine, but the tires definitely leave a lot to be desired in the snow. I dont feel unsafe, but im not totally confident in the tires either.

Pros: does fine
Cons: not totally confident
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA › Tires
CL1VE-B1XBY
  • Grip:
Rating 1.0

Never had a Yokohama tire last more than 30k miles on three different vehicles, so I won’t be buying them again.

Cons: poor mileage
Mileage: 48280 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA › Tires
SubieGal9
  • Grip:
Rating 2.0

I had the Yokohama with orange oil on my previous Crosstrek, and it slid in every turn no matter how slow I went.

Cons: slid in every turn
Vehicle: Subaru
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 78

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
VS

Tires MICHELIN or Continental

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Pirelli

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Falken

VS

Tires MICHELIN or BRIDGESTONE

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Goodyear

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Nokia

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Hankook

VS

Tires MICHELIN or YOKOHAMA

Show all

Which tires to choose — Nexen or YOKOHAMA?

If choosing tires across many manufacturers, check the part ranking. If your choice is down to two brands, the PartReview part comparisons help.

We compare tires across these categories:

Comparison of tires Nexen and YOKOHAMA
  1. PR Score.
  2. Overall ranking.
  3. Vote balance.
  4. Average rating.
  5. Number of reviews.
  6. Feature ratings.
  7. Car owners’ choice.

Which tires are better — YOKOHAMA or Nexen?

In March 2026 on PartReview, tires YOKOHAMA were overall better than Nexen.

  1. Nexen received a PR Score of 71 out of 100, and YOKOHAMA scored 82 points.
  2. Nexen ranked 19 in the overall ranking, and YOKOHAMA ranked 6.
  3. The average rating is higher for YOKOHAMA (4) than for Nexen (3.5).
  4. Tires YOKOHAMA have better feature ratings than Nexen:
    • Grip - owners believe, that this property for YOKOHAMA is better than Nexen.
    • Ride comfort - drivers claim, that this property for YOKOHAMA is outperforms Nexen.
    • Noise - reviews suggest, that this property for Nexen is preferred to YOKOHAMA.

Which tires are more popular — Nexen or YOKOHAMA?

In March 2026 on PartReview, tires YOKOHAMA were overall more popular than Nexen.

By vote balance, tires YOKOHAMA surpassed Nexen:

  • For Nexen, the ratio of positive (537) to negative (213) votes is 324 votes.
  • For YOKOHAMA, the ratio of positive (1371) to negative (288) votes is 1083 votes.

By number of reviews, tires YOKOHAMA surpassed Nexen:

  • For tires Nexen there are 241 review: 161 positive, 27 neutral, 53 negative.
  • For tires YOKOHAMA there are 539 reviews: 429 positive, 42 neutral, 68 negative.

Which tires do car owners prefer — Nexen or YOKOHAMA?

In March 2026, according to PartReview, tires YOKOHAMA led more car-specific ratings than Nexen:

YOKOHAMA are chosen by owners of cars such as: BMW M2, Dodge Dakota, Porsche Cayenne, Skoda Octavia, Suzuki Swift, Jeep Compass, Nissan Pathfinder, Toyota Celica, Toyota Fortuner, Toyota MR2, Volkswagen Beetle, and others.

Tires Nexen have not yet taken leading positions in car-specific ratings. You can help by adding a review and specifying your car.

Other comparisons of tires

If this comparison didn’t fully answer your question, there are many others on PartReview.

For example, comparisons of tires Nexen with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, Toyo, Kumho.

Also available: comparisons of tires YOKOHAMA with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, Toyo, Kumho.

You can also see who is better among other tires manufacturers: MICHELIN or Continental, MICHELIN or Pirelli, MICHELIN or Falken, MICHELIN or BRIDGESTONE, MICHELIN or Goodyear.

Loading...
›