Tires Nexen or Kumho

Nexen Tires
Itzed2u
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

I’ve owned a lot of VWs, and this is the only one that has not consumed any oil from the very beginning. I’ve actually joked that I’m concerned about that. I kept my previous 2016 GTI until I bought this car last year - 212K miles and it consumed about a quart and a half between 5K interval changes, ever since new. In fact all of my VWs have consumed something since new and that amount never really changed, so I do believe it is most likely build tolerances and luck of the draw. That said, I wouldn’t hesitate to drive a car that consumed a reasonable amount these days and I consider that normal. Build quality has been better than I expected for a car in this price range. Comfort is very good, but it’s not what I would call sporty in any way (coming from a GTI). some people complain about the lag on acceleration but I believe that is the transmission programming and there are ways you can drive it that minimize that. I think the Nexen tires are decent enough and they seem to wearing well.

Pros: no oil consumption, decent wear
Mileage: 30000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho Tires

Owned two sets of kuhmo LX Platinum excellent budget tire very quiet got 45k miles with a few rotations still didn't hit wear bar when changed. I will say not good at all in any sort of snow.

Pros: excellent budget tire, very quiet
Cons: not good in snow
Mileage: 72420 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho Tires

Not low grip but sticky in yet durable and fairly quick is the Kumho Ecsta V730.

Shit for we weather tough, to be fair

Pros: durable, fairly quick
Cons: shit for wet weather
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho Tires
lesmartin
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 5.0

We went with Kumho Crugen tires when it was time to replace the stock Yokohama Geolanders. Its probably been 20K miles and they have been great. Quiet and the car handles the same.

Pros: quiet, great handling
Vehicle: Mazda
Mileage: 32186 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nexen Tires

We ran those Nexens for a few years on a Ford Focus RS AWD in winter and it's a solid tire... The Michelin is a better tire especially on ice, but for $150 less I would take the Nexens again. This is in ND, so winters can get pretty extreme and they perform well.

Pros: solid tire, performs well
Vehicle: Ford Focus
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho Tires
InsertBluescreenHere
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 3.0

I had them on a car. Rode nice and quiet. Great rain traction. belt did end up breaking in one tire causing a tumor and another was starting to fail after 6 years.

Pros: nice and quiet ride
Cons: belt ended up breaking
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho Tires

The V730s are in the bottom of their class in rain performance in Tire Rack's testing and I tend to agree with their ranking.

Cons: bad rain performance
Vehicle: BMW
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 ... 67

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...