Tires Nexen or BRIDGESTONE

BRIDGESTONE Tires

Big fan of my Bridgestone Turanza AS 6’s.

Never had any rear end slippage in either of my BMWs, even when taking corners a *bit* too hard in rain/sleet

Pros: no rear end slippage
Vehicle: BMW
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nexen Tires
williecnelson
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

Honda Ridge, had the original roadian htx for first set, they held up great. good in dry and rain, no hydro issues, lasted long time, and decent ride. they can ride a little firm but i also have a Ridge. held air really well.

Pros: held up great, good in dry
Cons: ride a little firm
Vehicle: Honda
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

Tenho Bridgestone Turanza no meu e aquilo agarra que se dana (mas também tenho 225 à frente e 255 atrás).Fica a recomendação!

Pros: agarra que se dana
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires
Hiho2394
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

Worked in a tire shop for 10 years now and hate basically all Bridgestone. You can essentially cut whatever mileage warranty they put on the tire in half. They may ride well but longevity is definitely not something Bridgestone strives for. Michelin on the other hand will usually last the full warranty and if properly taken care of last well beyond that. I've had a lot of good feedback on the cc2 and went to a class based around them and all terrain tires. They performed phenomenal on the wet track we did.

Pros: performed phenomenal on wet
Cons: longevity is not great
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nexen Tires

Out of all the ones you have listed, I would take the Nexens without a second thought... Great tires, very underrated, and arguably the best warranty in the industry including a 2 year road hazard warranty from the manufacturer.

Pros: great tires, underrated
Vehicle: Honda
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nexen Tires

the Nexen is a grand touring tire that emphasizes driveability but sacrifices a little mpg to do it.

Pros: emphasizes driveability
Cons: sacrifices mpg
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires
AlanS
  • Grip:
Rating 3.0

There was about 3-4 mm of tread left on the tires when I replaced the original Bridgestone S005s (with 7,000 miles including one track day). I had a track day coming up so I wanted fresh tires but might have got a little more life if I really pushed them. I remember reading reviews on Tire Rack's website about people getting similarly short life out of them (maybe the other alternative OEM tires fare better but they're all 240 TW). I replaced the Bridgestones with Michelin PS4S (300 TW), so it will be interesting to see how they do. To be honest, on previous cars, I've never got more than about 25,000 miles our of HP or UHP all-season tires with 500-600 TW ratings so the 7,000 - 8,000 miles for these didn't surprise me.

Cons: short tread life
Mileage: 11265 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

My bridgestons kept making bubbles so i replaced them all, i have no problems after that, i even got continentals on my GLC300 now

Pros: no problems after replacement
Cons: kept making bubbles
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 ... 116

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...