Tires MICHELIN or YOKOHAMA

YOKOHAMA Tires

I had 15" steelies on my car originally - ran Yoko AVS dB in 205/60/15. Gigantic improvement over the stock rubber (Goodyear Eagle LS 195/65/15). Great dry and wet traction - a lot of fun on the twisties.

Pros: great dry and wet traction
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires
Spell Check Desk
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

I've got Michelin Pilot XGT H4s on my 'roc... They're holding up reqally well, they're three years old now and still have lots of tread left on them, they're awesome in the rain too which is a good thing 'cos I live in Raincouver

Pros: holding up well, awesome in rain
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires

The 17" Wheels on the MCS weigh 25 lbs. The 17" Runflats weigh 25 lbs. SO 50 lbs a corner. I went to the MINI R84 16" wheels and the Yokohama AVS ES100 205/50 R16's and saved 70 lbs of rotating weight.

Pros: saved 70 lbs
Cons: weighs 50 lbs a corner
Vehicle: MINI
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires
Xman
  • Grip:
Rating 4.0

The car still has the stock Michelin MXV4 Plus 205/55 16H tires. I do not dispute that true snow tires outperform them. These tires suffice for both good and bad weather until one obtains more specialized sets for the seasons one encounters in their area. I plan on getting 17x8 wheels with Kumho 712s for the summer, and going with these for the winter until they wear out. Regardless, 4Mo provides superior safety and handling in any situation.

Pros: suffice for good and bad weather, superior safety and handling
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

Well, I had a set of XGT V4 (not on my dub) before they came out with the Pilot XGT V4 and they handled pretty well. But, they were bald in appox. 20k miles. So, I replaced them with the Khumo ECSTA Supra 712's. They were awesome, they handled much better than the XGT's and were much cheaper.

Pros: handled pretty well, much cheaper
Cons: bald in 20k miles
Mileage: 32186 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

I had the same question and just checked mine. From the dealership I had appx 42 PSI front and 44 PSI rear (cold). As this didn't match the gas door recommendations. I called the dealer's (Chapman, Scottsdale AZ) service department. The front desk finally transferred me to the tire shop (note Chapman also sells BMW and Dodge) the helpful technician listened to my specifications and question and responded that he recommends 38 PSI front and rear in Phoenix. For all vehicles with similar low profile tires.He was very specific about location (asked me if I lived here in town). I'm guessing that's due to our good old dry heat here. Anyhow that's what I set mine to. regards, Ken

Pros: recommends 38 PSI front/rear
Cons: 42/44 PSI from dealership
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires
dixonL2
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 4.0

The 378's are great, very quiet and great in rain/snow (were my snows until I changed cars). The RE930's are really nice - quiet, but not as quiet as the 378's, perhaps a bit more responsive - but are a little more worn.

Pros: very quiet, great in rain/snow
Cons: a little more worn
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires

I have Yokahama AVS dB's on my Q45. They are quite possibly the best tire I've owned on any car.

Pros: best tire I've owned
Vehicle: Infiniti Q45
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

I drove last winter on the Michelin Arctic Alpins, including into ski areas, etc and they were just great.

Pros: just great
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...