Tires MICHELIN or Nokia

Nokia Tires

Nokian WR G3. It is a all-weather tire (all-season with the mountain-snowflake for severe winter conditions). They are available in 225/45r18 It's not going to have the dry road grip of the DWS06 or A/S3+, but will easily outperform them in the winter, that we are suppose to have.

Pros: outperform them in the winter
Cons: less dry road grip
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

So, this year, I banked big and bought the test-winning studded tires from Nokian (Hakapeliita 8). And let me tell you, I don't think I'm going back to studless tires ever, unless studded tires suddenly become illegal here.

- The grip and handling-ability on ice is unmatched. Everyone who sais that studless tires have come such a long way that there almost isn't a difference anymore has never tried a studded tire and should shut up. Especially the difference in brake-ability on ice is huge. Studded tires outperform studless in any icy-condition, that is for sure and any other claim is wrong. these tires really have given me confidence that no other studless tire has before.

Pros: grip and handling unmatched
Cons: noisy, mushy feel
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires
1725
  • Grip:
Rating 5.0

Nokian's I've just put on the Hakk R2s for this winter. I was running WRG2s which I was thoroughly impressed with.

Pros: thoroughly impressed
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

The AS remind me of all of my Pilot experiences in the wet. But I am cautious when probing limits on public roads; I have yet to experience these in the wet on roads that I know well. I really want to feel how these break loose - sudden or gradual - after loosing traction on wet roads. But they do continue to impress me, far beyond the Pirellis.

Pros: impressive wet performance
Vehicle: Volkswagen
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

I also just bought the AS3+ for the mix of wear rating and performance (I also have dedicated winter tires so this wasn't important for me neither) and I'm also REALLY pleased with them. They actually handle stage 2 power better than the Potenza, which is a summer tire. I now have 10 000 km on them and I can honestly say that they offer equivalent or even better performance than many summer tires I had. I actually planned to trade them for PSS if I weren't satisfied, but I really am so I'm keeping them. I don't track my car, but as I said I'm stage 2 and do lots of spirited driving, and these tires are great!!

Pros: great performance, good wear
Vehicle: Volkswagen
Mileage: 10000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires
cruster
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 5.0

I had X-ice Xi3s on the Fiesta ST I owned for just over 2 years, and I actually liked driving on them more than the stock Bridgestone Potenza RE50A. Obviously not as much grip in drier weather, but for anything below 40 degrees or so, and certainly any snow, they were fantastic, and a lot easier to live with (much quieter; much more compliant, although part of that was also being on a smaller winter wheel).

Pros: much quieter, more compliant
Cons: less grip drier weather
Vehicle: Ford Fiesta
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

I have a set of 16" rims on order that will be getting Nokian Hakkapeliitta R2 winter tires (205/55R16). They'll be getting installed at the end of October, after the car arrives.

Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

Sell your tires and buy 4 Michelin Primacy, you will immediately see the night and day grip difference

Pros: night and day grip difference
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...