Tires MICHELIN or Nokia

MICHELIN Tires

Michelin; been caught in rain dumps on long trips and the michelins were fabulous. Solid in the dry and i felt safe in the wet as well.

Pros: solid in dry, safe in wet
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

Have a look at [nokians outpost apt](https://simpletire.com/brands/nokian-tires/outpost-apt), should be cheaper than all 3 of your options and it’s also higher temperature and tread wear rated at 700AA vs 620AB, 600AB and 600AB, (tread wear #, traction grade, temperature grade). It also has nokian’s aramid Fiber reinforcement

Pros: cheaper than options, higher rated
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

As unbelievable at this picture looks I have had exactly the same tyre wear on my R58 - my front tyres 3-4mm across tread and both rear tyres almost completely bald across entire width and these were Michelin PS 4

Pros: tyre wear same
Cons: rear tyres bald
Vehicle: MINI
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires
highonpie77
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 2.0

I’ve had these for about 18 months / 15K miles on my 18’ AWD LX and I can’t say I’m a fan. Although they are amazing in the rain. I ironically wish for rain sometimes for longer trips because they drive SO much better on wet pavement compared to dry.

- The road noise is ridiculous on an AWD model.

- They’re wearing very fast for tires with only 15K.

- Drop in fuel efficiency once installed (~2MPG drop).

- Rocks, twigs, and everything else you can imagine get stuck in the grooves and can lead to a rough ride.

Pros: amazing in the rain
Cons: road noise is ridiculous
Vehicle: Honda
Mileage: 24140 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...