Tires MICHELIN or Nokia

MICHELIN Tires

The great white north here.  Excellent traction in snow, and pretty good on ice.   The benefits in wet and dry traction over normal winters for the times when it's not extreme conditions outweighs having dedicated winter tires. At least where I'm at.

Pros: excellent traction in snow
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

Also there are better summer tires out there, I recommend the Michelin pilot sport 4s or the new Continental that recently came out, they have amazing performance and last a long time.

Pros: amazing performance, last long
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

We have Blizzaks on one vehicle and Nokian Hakkapolita on the other. Of the two, I prefer the Hakkas but that may be more to that I prefer that vehicle more. Either are very good but don’t forget to drive to the conditions.

Pros: very good
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

Nokian Hakkapellitas with studs on all 4 of our vehicles. For winters I go premium. Makes a huge difference

Pros: premium, huge difference
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

Have a set of Hakka 10 studded on my Ram 1500 rwd work truck and they are PHENOMENAL!

Central Canada here for reference and these tires are amazing on wet/clear roads and great in icy conditions with a couple hundred pound over the rear axle.

Pros: amazing on wet/clear roads
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires
dibya17
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 3.5

I recently got Michelin defender 2, not as smooth as cross climate, but high durability and reasonably quite

Pros: high durability, reasonably quite
Cons: not as smooth
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...