Tires MICHELIN or Nokia

MICHELIN Tires
JDM-TIM
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

I’ve had both tires on my nismo z I liked Michelins how they rode they were much softer but they don’t last long at all, now I’m on toyos they ride as good as Michelins maybe a little harder but thread wise they last much longer.

Pros: good ride, long lasting
Cons: softer, don't last long
Vehicle: Nissan
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

Aiemmin ajanut random nastoilla, mutta Nokia Hakkapelitta R5 kitkat tuli hankittua kun sähköautoon vaihdoin pari vuotta sitten enkä kyllä muita talvirenkaita enää huolisi. Menee säässä kun säässä eikä kertaakaan ole tarvinnut jännittää että pääseekö perille.

Pros: menee säässä kun säässä
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

Syksyllä hankin etuvetoiseen autoon Nordman 9 -nastarenkaat, ja hyvin ovat pitäneet kovemmillakin vauhdeilla ja erittäin liukkailla keleillä. On testattu toimivaksi sekä Etelä-Suomessa että Pohjois-Norjan vuoristossa.

Pros: hyvin ovat pitäneet
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

I got 19's with cc2's on MYP I get MAYBE a hair better efficiency over the the 21 ubwrturbines. They also have a decent amount of annoying whirring/road noise :/ but winter performance should be great.

Pros: winter performance great
Cons: annoying whirring/road noise
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

These tires are a death trap in snow. In a heavy wet snow the snow collects in the treads to create a flat, slick surface allowing the tire to slide before stopping. On a hill it's even worse. They work ok on wet surfaces.

Pros: work ok on wet surfaces
Cons: death trap in snow
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...