Tires MICHELIN or Nexen

MICHELIN Tires

I bought all weather Michelin cross climate2 tires. I don’t want to have 2 sets of tires. I live in southern Ontario and we get snow yes but roads are generally taken care of well and I don’t go North at all.

Pros: all weather tires
Cons: two sets not needed
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

I put good winter tires on it (Michelin X-Ice Snow EV) and I’ve not had an issue with RWD. Today was the first day I’ve driven it in pure winter conditions and it was a dream to drive.

Pros: no issues, dream to drive
Mileage: 5000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires
Bearloot33
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 4.0

I bought these when living in Western Colorado and they did great for last winter. I also had a great experience with them in the PNW/Western Oregon in a more rainy than snowy climate. They were about $1000 total and came with a reasonable warranty which I recommend for any AWD vehicle.

I do notice that they can be loud but I don't care. They also seem to decrease fuel efficiency but I am okay with that since I am starting with high efficiency in the first place.

Pros: great experience
Cons: can be loud
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

recently replaced OEM falken on my 21 CE for some Pilot sports and smh.. idk why i waited so long. car feels so great driving. tires have great grip. corners takign with ease. and if acceleration is amazing.

Pros: great grip, amazing acceleration
Cons: falkens felt like dirt
Mileage: 19312 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nexen Tires

From our personal experience and also clients’ feedback we have had much better performance with the Sport R compared to the RT660. Autocross conditions will have the Sport R need a little more warmup, however it does not fall off as much as the RT660 (especially after heat cycles) and yes longevity is much longer on the Sport R. The RT660 also has a tread splicing issue that we really don’t like to see in a performance tire.

Pros: better performance, longer longevity
Cons: needs more warmup
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires
TensaFlow
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

Michelin Defender 2. I replaced all 4 just past 30,000 miles. Expensive, but high quality and rated to last 80,000 miles.

Pros: high quality
Cons: expensive
Mileage: 30000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

Ive used then for daily driving to work and driving to 10+ autocross and tracks days a year, I’ve been pretty competitive in cam-c with this tire and they still have 1 more year in them. I live in Utah so we get plenty of wet weather. My most competitive autocross events are the wet weather events.

Pros: competitive, good in wet weather
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

Thoughts on CrossClimate2 for San Francisco/CA climate? Considering these for 2020 Kia Niro EV to replace current OEM Michelin Primacy MXV4, which we have found to be terribly un-grippy in rain.

Cons: un-grippy in rain
Vehicle: Kia
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...