Tires MICHELIN or Maxxis

Maxxis Tires

They're fantastic for DE's / non-competition for all the reasons you list. I 100% recommend for HPDE for both performance and bang-for-buck. Pros: -They last a very long time compared to every other R compound tire out there (I've run Toyo, Hankook, Hoosier, etc etc.) -Cheap compared to other 100 treadwear tires. They ship straight from Maxxis and come with a T-shirt. -Not a lot of fade, both during a session and over multiple heat cycles -They give you a lot of feedback and tend not to snap loose

Pros: long lasting, cheap
Cons: slower lap times
Vehicle: Mazda
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

The AS remind me of all of my Pilot experiences in the wet. But I am cautious when probing limits on public roads; I have yet to experience these in the wet on roads that I know well. I really want to feel how these break loose - sudden or gradual - after loosing traction on wet roads. But they do continue to impress me, far beyond the Pirellis.

Pros: impressive wet performance
Vehicle: Volkswagen
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

I also just bought the AS3+ for the mix of wear rating and performance (I also have dedicated winter tires so this wasn't important for me neither) and I'm also REALLY pleased with them. They actually handle stage 2 power better than the Potenza, which is a summer tire. I now have 10 000 km on them and I can honestly say that they offer equivalent or even better performance than many summer tires I had. I actually planned to trade them for PSS if I weren't satisfied, but I really am so I'm keeping them. I don't track my car, but as I said I'm stage 2 and do lots of spirited driving, and these tires are great!!

Pros: great performance, good wear
Vehicle: Volkswagen
Mileage: 10000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires
cruster
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 5.0

I had X-ice Xi3s on the Fiesta ST I owned for just over 2 years, and I actually liked driving on them more than the stock Bridgestone Potenza RE50A. Obviously not as much grip in drier weather, but for anything below 40 degrees or so, and certainly any snow, they were fantastic, and a lot easier to live with (much quieter; much more compliant, although part of that was also being on a smaller winter wheel).

Pros: much quieter, more compliant
Cons: less grip drier weather
Vehicle: Ford Fiesta
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

Sell your tires and buy 4 Michelin Primacy, you will immediately see the night and day grip difference

Pros: night and day grip difference
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

I have NO issues with wet weather traction with the Michelin PSS on my GTI. Much better than the stock Pirelli all-season tires.

Pros: excellent wet weather traction
Vehicle: Volkswagen
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires
AdamSheikh
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 5.0

Also, to answer your question regarding the Michelin PSS - I made the switch from the stock all seasons over a year and a half ago...They absolutely transform the car. The stiffer sidewall increases steering feel and responsiveness, and the softer compound not only rides better but also grips like hell in the corners. Wet traction and confidence also increased significantly.

Pros: increased wet traction, better steering feel
Mileage: 23000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

Another vote for the Continental DWS... I have had them for front tires on my '06 for about a year..only reason I haven't replaced the stock rears is because they still have tread left at 73K!(they are Michelin Primacys which are a nice tire but only under dry or wet conditions..tread life is awesome, but they're terrible in snow)

Pros: awesome tread life
Cons: terrible in snow
Mileage: 73000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...