Tires MICHELIN or Laufenn

MICHELIN Tires

Had them, loved them. Didn’t get the tread life out of them I had hoped (40K) even with 5,000 mile rotations, but I’ve been told I drive “spirited”. Put Goodyear Assurance Weatherready 2’s on my daughter’s car and they are quieter and the fuel mileage decrease doesn’t seem to be as significant as the CC2’s, with pretty close to the same tread pattern. I would feel quite comfortable with either of them as an all weather tire with snow capability. Either tire you buy you won’t be disappointed in my opinion.

Pros: comfortable all weather tire
Cons: less tread life
Mileage: 64373 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

I got them on my Subaru Outback about 3 weeks ago. Recommended by most of the Outback owners here on Reddit and they were right! l live in MN and we have had lots of snow this winter. They are fantastic and highly recommend them.

Pros: fantastic in snow
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires
Elsie_the_LC
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

I just got these on my Volvo last week. I told my tire shop, that my husband’s family has been going to for well over 40 years, to order some up for me that they like better than the continentals that were on it. I should mention that I live in Florida and maybe it is different where you are from, but I was shocked how ugly they were. That said, they ride nice and are pretty quiet.

Pros: ride nice, quiet
Cons: ugly
Vehicle: Volvo
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

We have cross climates on our Ascent and they're great. Almost makes me look forward to winter!

Pros: great, look forward to winter
Vehicle: Subaru
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires
BigDisarray
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 5.0

Just had them put on my car, a 2023 Explorer ST, and yes they're worth the money. For context, I live in Maine, and travel a lot for youth sports, and often with 5 souls on board. They're awesome tires and I feel safe driving in them at all times. They handle wet, slushy roads so well and in the summer they're still responsive enough.

Pros: handle wet, slushy roads
Cons: expensive
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

Love the CC2. We had some snow here in Michigan this week and I was very happy with the way they performed.

Pros: happy with performance
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

Absolutely. I got them for a 23 Jetta and the difference between stock and this is insane. Unreal grip, and I haven’t lost control yet in about 15k miles ever, not even as much as a burnout (which was very common on the stock kumhos).

Pros: unreal grip
Cons: less mileage
Mileage: 24140 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Laufenn Tires
otterland
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 5.0

I have had Laufenn G Fit on my Honda Fit since this summer. They're Hankooks and fantastic. I wanted a low noise grand touring tire and these had pretty good reviews and I got them for about 85 bucks each a corner on sale and thought, this is a Pimp My Ride moment that I cannot give up. I mean I heard you liked Fits yo so I got you four G Fits for your Fit.

This Honda is a noisy car compared to most other modern cars and the previous Sumitomos roared with half the tread left. These new guys just sort of hum quietly and calmly and sometimes I don't even hear them on really good pavement. They are night and day better as far as comfort and noise.

The highway feel is amazing, they track really well and took away any squirliness of the car which it inherently has because it's rather lightweight. It feels like you're driving a little train, but it easily switches lanes when you need to. I don't feel like I need to correct as much when I'm at speed.

Criticisms you'll find online have to do with wet weather grip which I took pretty seriously by going out to some empty roads and trying to peel out and slide in a torrential downpour. I couldn't find any fault with them compared to the older tires.

Of course they might not be the right tires on something else like a big old German touring sedan. But on this 2500 lb Honda they are comically good for the price.

I like them so much I'm thinking about getting some for my CRV as well. I like them better than the Michelin Defender that were on a car that I just sold. Of course, I think the Michelin probably has longer tread wear, but as far as the driving feel these cheap tires are amazing.

Just a reminder, I'm talking about the G version and not the X or I think they make an s version too. But I assume they all have similar carcasses and compounds.

Pros: fantastic, low noise, amazing highway feel
Cons: wet weather grip
Vehicle: Honda Fit
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

I live in southern Ontario in Canada and after one winter of driving around mainly in the city I decided that they weren\u2019t enough especially when going up any sort of incline with snow on the ground. I recently got a set of Michelin Ice-X tires and it makes a world of a difference. In the end if there\u2019s anything more than a light dusting on the ground dedicated winters is the way to go. Also for context I drive a FWD Volvo V50. All in all they are great but as someone else said. Jack of all trades, master of none.

Pros: great all around
Cons: not enough grip
Vehicle: Volvo V50
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

I’ve run both, the Nokians are the better tire. I genuinely was not impressed with the CC2, snow/ice braking was pathetic.

Pros: Nokians are better tire
Cons: pathetic snow/ice braking
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 ... 284

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...