Tires MICHELIN or Kumho

MICHELIN Tires

If you don't need deep snow traction, go with Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4. I run them on my sports cars. Excellent cold weather and rain traction. Quiet. Good in light snow and slush.

Pros: excellent cold weather traction
Cons: light snow and slush
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

+1 to the Nokian's if you just need one tire. Personally, keep the stock tire and get some snows for winter use. Been using the Michelin X-Ice3's and they are fantastic and a hell a lot cheaper than the comparible Hakka R series.

Pros: fantastic, cheaper than Hakka
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho Tires

I bought a set of Kuhmo all-seasons for my Jetta. Was extremely pleased with them after not liking the Continentals they replaced (two punctures and two sidewall dimples; one was replaced by Continental).

Pros: extremely pleased
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

Energysavers arent so good on wet surfaces, but on normal driving I did not have any problems conserning traction. I had them at rear for 2 years. They last very long.

Pros: long lasting, normal traction
Cons: bad on wet surfaces
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho Tires

i have kuhmo supras(195 45 16) and they suck for traction. SUCK I had dunlop w10's, they were ok, but lasted like 15k miles. thats my input

Pros: Dunlop ok
Cons: Kuhmo suck for traction
Mileage: 15000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...