Tires MICHELIN or IRONMAN

MICHELIN Tires

I only put ~8k kms / 5000 miles on them, so I can't comment on longevity. But I drove them through snow, sleet and heavy rain (winter tires), and up to 125mph on the German Autobahn, and they were just fine.

Pros: were just fine
Cons: cannot comment on longevity
Mileage: 8000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires
Sarionum
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

I would choose Michelin AS4s over the Contis if they're available and in your price range. They offer better MPG and ride comfort over the Contis while delivering more grip in the wet and dry. Just an all around better tire, but the Conti is still great albeit a little heavier than Michelin.

Pros: better MPG, ride comfort
Cons: a little heavier
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires
lilcole1
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

I replaced the stock ones on my 21 (@ 35k) with Michelin CC2’s a few weeks ago. My fuel mileage went down by a few MPG but the ride is much smoother and quieter. And I tested them out in the snow and ice today. Well worth the extra money!

Pros: ride much smoother, quieter
Cons: fuel mileage went down
Vehicle: Toyota
Mileage: 35000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

Had these same Michelins on a FWD car. If you never plan to drive on dirt or gravel roads, or in snow ice, they’re probably decent, but not awesome in heavy rain. Consider the mileage rating for Pilot vs other Michelin tires that cost slightly more because the Pilots didn’t last me long.

Pros: probably decent
Cons: not awesome in rain
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

My experience with Michelin is that they are terrible tires and WAY over priced for a terrible tire.

Pros: Douglas tires cost next to nothing
Cons: terrible tires, WAY overpriced
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...