Tires MICHELIN or Firestone

MICHELIN Tires

If you don't need deep snow traction, go with Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4. I run them on my sports cars. Excellent cold weather and rain traction. Quiet. Good in light snow and slush.

Pros: excellent cold weather traction
Cons: light snow and slush
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

+1 to the Nokian's if you just need one tire. Personally, keep the stock tire and get some snows for winter use. Been using the Michelin X-Ice3's and they are fantastic and a hell a lot cheaper than the comparible Hakka R series.

Pros: fantastic, cheaper than Hakka
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Firestone Tires

Another vote for the Firestone Winterforce tires... Michigan's Upper Peninsula, with LOTS of snow, and I travel the entire area. Most of what we get is snow, minimal ice, and after experimenting with several different brands we go back to the Winterforce every time.

Pros: works in lots of snow
Cons: somewhat noisy
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Firestone Tires
GruvDesign
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 4.0

That being said if you're looking for cheap NEW winter tires, Firestone Winterforce tires are fantastic. They're kind of loud, but they work great.

Pros: work great
Cons: kind of loud
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

The AS remind me of all of my Pilot experiences in the wet. But I am cautious when probing limits on public roads; I have yet to experience these in the wet on roads that I know well. I really want to feel how these break loose - sudden or gradual - after loosing traction on wet roads. But they do continue to impress me, far beyond the Pirellis.

Pros: impressive wet performance
Vehicle: Volkswagen
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...