Tires MICHELIN or Falken

MICHELIN Tires

Niveau longévité il n'y a pas photo, j'ai une voiture qui bouffe du pneu à outrance et je vois la différence entre le Michelin que j'avais avant et la dernière monture Dunlop que j'ai posée.

Pour moi ça reste la référence.

Pros: longévité, reste la référence
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

De mon expérience, les pneus Michelin durent toujours très longtemps.

Par exemple sur ma voiture, j'ai des primacy 4 a l'avant. Ils ont 51 000 km et ils sont toujours bon.

Pros: durent toujours très longtemps
Mileage: 51000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

Put on the Michelins cross climate 2 and forget about any slippage in snow or hydroplaning in rain for the next 60 K miles.

Pros: no slippage in snow
Mileage: 20000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

Really like our Pilot 4. Really grippy on dry, and very confident in the rain. I got on top of them a little and they held fine on wet pavement.

Pros: grippy on dry
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken Tires

I'm 3k miles in on my 23 pro. 285/75/16's w/ spacers.

The Falken's are quieter.

They gave better grip in wet and icy conditions.

They did result in a very mild mpg hit.

Pros: quieter, better grip
Cons: mild mpg hit
Mileage: 4828 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken Tires

Have them on a RAV4 TRD and they are nearly the same as the Falken that were stock, both are not really a truck winter tire in my opinion.

Pros: nearly the same
Cons: not winter tire
Vehicle: Toyota
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

I absolutely hate Michelin. The sidewalls are terrible and you start seeing cracks in them way earlier than other brands that are much cheaper.

Cons: terrible sidewalls, cracks
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...