Tires MICHELIN or DEBICA

MICHELIN Tires

Just got CC2s for my 23 CRV and the performance is night and day from the OEM tires! We've had a weird stretch of snow in MN lately and they've been as good as advertised!

Pros: performance is night and day
Vehicle: Honda
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

I have been through a set and yes they are worth the money. They are great all weather tires but I will say this when it comes to deeper snow and ice you won't beat a dedicated snow tire like Blizzaks. I ran my Cross CLimates 2s on my pruis year round and did great with them.

Pros: great all weather tires
Cons: worse than snow tires
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

Love ‘em. Way better than factory tires (Bridgestone) on our RX. And better than the similar Goodyears from 15 years ago. Very quiet and great handling.

Pros: very quiet, great handling
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires
darklogic85
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 4.0

We put them on my wife's crossover/SUV and liked them. The road noise was slightly more than her previous set, which I think was Michelin Primary Tour A/S, if I recall. However, the snow performance on the CC was much better. We live in the Chicago suburbs, so having the better traction and grip in the snow was a worthwhile trade off for the road noise.

Pros: better snow performance
Cons: more road noise
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

Just put them on my wife’s Crosstrek, she immediately said she felt more confident in the car. I drove it for the first time in snow a few days ago and was very surprised at how well it did. Would absolutely buy again.

Pros: felt more confident
Vehicle: Subaru
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

I have an appointment Monday to get my current CC2s replaced with a fresh set of CC2s. I got 40k miles out of them, which is good enough for me. They are great in the rain/wet, with excellent hydroplane resistance, and they are very capable in the snow and ice.

Pros: great in rain/wet
Mileage: 64373 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

I've been using the CC2s here in NE Wisconsin for the past 3 (rav4 Prime) and now 4th winter (RX 4450h+). While they won't provide nearly the same level of ice traction as a fully dedicated winter tire, the snow and ice traction is best available for any non-winter tire on the market today. The level of grip in snow, even deep snow is amazing!

Pros: amazing grip in snow
Cons: less ice traction
Vehicle: Toyota
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

I’ve run both, the Nokians are the better tire. I genuinely was not impressed with the CC2, snow/ice braking was pathetic.

Pros: Nokians are better tire
Cons: pathetic snow/ice braking
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 ... 276

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...