Tires MICHELIN or BRIDGESTONE

BRIDGESTONE Tires

I had bridgestone s-03 last season. They were amazing, but don't last too long, which is why I might purchase these pirellis.

Pros: amazing performance
Cons: don't last too long
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires
audiophiliac
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 5.0

I am running 36 up front and 38 in the rear on my new 205/45-16 Bridgestone 750s. And I took it through the twisties pretty hard on saturday and it worked awesome even on the stock suspension! Good balance...not too much understeer.

Pros: Good balance, awesome performance
Cons: stock suspension
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

Don't know about the Toyos but the PS2'S are great. They handle excellent in the rain and in the dry. High Speed stability is excellent as well.

Pros: handle excellent in rain
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires
mec_vw
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 4.0

Yes, they'll start talking when you reach their limits of adhesion. Not as loudly as the F1s, but at pretty much the same point (just as they're starting to let go--which seems to be fairly gradual and predictable).

Pros: gradual and predictable
Cons: not as loud as F1s
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

I just ran a track weekend at Pocono Raceway with my PS2's, 245/35/19. They performed extremely well for a street tire.

Pros: performed extremely well
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires
mec_vw
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

The PS2s have a much stiffer sidewall than the stock Goodyear F1s, which is exactly what I was looking for. No noticeable tread squirm while cornering and sharper steering response as a result. Of course, this also means they provide a less cushy ride than the F1s--the surface of the road is communicated much more readily to the cabin. The PS2s also produce quite a bit more road noise. Driving on grooved/textured highways was much noisier than the F1s. The tread pattern also produces a tendency for these tires to follow grooves in the road, which was never an issue with the F1s. In terms of overall grip, the PS2s are outstanding. I took several corners at speed in the Ozark Mountains, and the PS2s showed no signs of letting go. Very confidence-inspiring. They're easily as grippy as the F1s, and actually felt as though they were superior in this regard. Wet weather performance was easily as good as the F1s, much to my pleasant surprise. I drove in conditions that varied from a light sprinkle to a heavy downpour, and the PS2s continued to perform as solidly as they did in the dry. I plowed through several puddles with not even a hint of hydroplaning.

Pros: outstanding grip, wet weather performance
Cons: more road noise, less cushy
Mileage: 600 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

Dood, give the Bridgestone potenza's G009 a shot. Just got them, have about 400 miles on them and Geez.. Don't i love taking 25mph ramps at 50-60mph. They are ALL season high perf. tires, with a 50,000 miles warranty.

Pros: high performance, good warranty
Mileage: 644 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires
CarlM2
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 4.0

Speaking of the RE950, my wife's Jetta has about 10,k miles on them and she's still extremely pleased with wet and dry performance. Also, the noise level is still low but, the tread sounds like it's wearing unevenly.

Pros: pleased with wet performance
Cons: tread wearing unevenly
Mileage: 10000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

My wife's CR-V has Michelin Artic Alpins, they work OK but they emit a really loud "whistle" on wet asphalt.

Pros: work OK
Cons: loud whistle on asphalt
Vehicle: Honda
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires
Zim
  • Grip:
Rating 1.0

Honestly, the Michelins are generally more recommended here over the Conti's... and after 35k on my 99, the best thing I ever did was get rid of the frickin Michelins, and replaced 'em with Bridgestone Potenza's... SOOOO much better wet traction

Pros: better wet traction
Cons: mediocre wet traction
Mileage: 56310 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...