Tires MICHELIN or BFGoodrich

MICHELIN Tires

I have an appointment Monday to get my current CC2s replaced with a fresh set of CC2s. I got 40k miles out of them, which is good enough for me. They are great in the rain/wet, with excellent hydroplane resistance, and they are very capable in the snow and ice.

Pros: great in rain/wet
Mileage: 64373 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

I've been using the CC2s here in NE Wisconsin for the past 3 (rav4 Prime) and now 4th winter (RX 4450h+). While they won't provide nearly the same level of ice traction as a fully dedicated winter tire, the snow and ice traction is best available for any non-winter tire on the market today. The level of grip in snow, even deep snow is amazing!

Pros: amazing grip in snow
Cons: less ice traction
Vehicle: Toyota
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires
CND5
  • Grip:
Rating 4.5

I have them on my Jetta TDI sportwagon and they are fantastic! First season we got a big ice storm here in the PNW and it was a complete shitshow! I could go anywhere, I regularly passed stuck 4x4s and was completely amazed at the performance on ice! Second season we got another ice storm and while they were still good definitely not as good as when new.

Pros: amazing performance on ice
Cons: performance degrades
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

They’re great tires but I will say that they are REALLY loud. Noticeably louder than the Defender 2s that they replaced. Noticeably louder than the original CrossClimates that I had on a different car.

Pros: great tires
Cons: REALLY loud
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

Or even a snow rated all season tire, like a Michelin CrossClimate 2. I have these on my AWD crossover and have been able to navigate lake effect snow with little to no issue. Maybe an occasional bit of oversteer, but very controllable.

Pros: navigate lake effect snow
Cons: occasional bit of oversteer
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires
radagdi
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 4.0

The Michelin X-Ice Snow isn’t quite as aggressive in deep stuff, but it’s way more consistent over the years, quieter, and usually lasts noticeably longer.

Pros: consistent, quieter, lasts longer
Cons: not aggressive in deep snow
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

I’ve run both, the Nokians are the better tire. I genuinely was not impressed with the CC2, snow/ice braking was pathetic.

Pros: Nokians are better tire
Cons: pathetic snow/ice braking
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 ... 308

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...