Tires Kumho or Nokia

Nokia Tires

I put them on a Model 3 and to me I don't feel like there's anything the CC2's can do significantly better that would justify being 40% more expensive than the WRG5's.

Pros: good tire, averages well
Cons: tradeoffs with other tires
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

the new set of Nokian Hakkapeliitta winter tires turned it into quite the beast in the snow and ice. I'm usually on the roads early before the plow and haven't gotten stuck or felt I couldn't continue because of the conditions.

Pros: excellent in snow and ice, never stuck
Vehicle: Ford Escape
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho Tires

Kumho sasvim povoljan i pristojan. Vec dva seta potrosio. Michelin isto imao , al pre pre skup a nista bolji od Kumha

Pros: povoljan i pristojan
Cons: nije nista bolji
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho Tires

The V730s are bulletproof and I was able to get about 150 runs out of them before they heatcycled out.

Pros: bulletproof
Cons: heatcycled out
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho Tires

If you're in arizona and it's not going to rain then go for the v730 all day. The v730 likes heat way better, and you'll get more runs out of a set.

Pros: likes heat way better
Cons: not quite as fast
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

Hey I know this thread is old, but I just discovered Hakkapeliittas and I'm planning to get those for next winter (start saving now). Just wondering is it still good without the studs? I live in Calgary Alberta.

Vehicle: Subaru
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires
ShadowyCollective
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

I replace the Michelin at 20K (completely bald and dead) with Nokian Tyres One and have no complaints. They actually netted me better wh/mi by 10 wh/mi and is rated for 80k wear. How long that will last on a Tesla is yet to be seen. So far 5K in it 's still at 95% which compare to the Michelin would of been at 75%

Pros: better wh/mi, rated 80k wear
Mileage: 5000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho Tires
fenderbassplaya
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 3.5

Overall happy with my Kumho Roadventure AT51 on my F150. Not the best on pure ice, but only real complaint on the F150 is they don’t seem to last as long as I’d like, but I run them all year and I’ll get equivalent of about 30,000mi out of a set, heavy truck, all year, towing, winter, mud, highway, you name it - and a lot of roundabouts in my neck of the woods which is apparently known to be hard on them… from chatting with buddies I get about 90% of the kms they get on a set of BFG KO2, but they cost about 20-30% less typically, and are quieter, and seem roughly equal capability otherwise.

Pros: Good value, quieter, capable
Cons: Poor on ice, shorter lifespan
Vehicle: Ford
Mileage: 48280 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires
iCutWaffles
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 1.0

I know this thread is 2 years old, but I have Nordman 7 on my 22 kona ev, and the grip is terrible. I have owned Hakkas on all my cars including subarus and they were top tier, on this car they don't grip for some reason.

The cabin noise is driving me crazy too, sort of excited to finish winter, and it ain't even started yet to be able to change them next year.

Cons: terrible grip, crazy cabin noise
Vehicle: Hyundai
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 ... 113

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...