Tires Kumho or Firestone

Firestone Tires

I have ran Firestone Winterforce and Firestone Winterforce 2 on my RWD R/T Chargers since 2009 and have zero complaints.

Pros: zero complaints, aggressive tread
Cons: replace every 2-3 years
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Firestone Tires

I went with Firestone destination at/2 in 235/65 r17. They are great and light weight! Only 4lbs more than stock tires.

Pros: great and light weight
Cons: 4lbs more than stock
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho Tires
Simengie
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

Example, I switched to Kumoho from GSC's on 93 Trans AM. Yes I gave up traction but I gained smoother ride, better wet road handling, and about 12000 more miles a set. which basically doubled what I was getting out of GSC's. No question a better tire. Kumoho was still not big yet but what they did make was really good.

Pros: smoother ride, better wet handling, longer mileage
Cons: less traction
Mileage: 19312 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho Tires

Upgraded to pilot sport AS at 30k miles because the Kumhos were no longer gripping in the rain (even though there was plenty of tread left).

Pros: better grip
Cons: poor rain grip
Mileage: 48280 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho Tires

Mid tiers. Pas tout a fait au niveau des meilleurs, mais pas mauvais non plus. Pas pour moi, je suis trop exigent, mais si tu veux pas mettre plus, c'est pas honteux.

Pros: pas mauvais
Cons: pas au niveau des meilleurs
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho Tires

I wore out a set of Kumho Ecsta 712's on my Miata in about 7.5K miles. Of course I was sliding the rears using the throttle to steer around curves on Highway 9 in California.

Cons: wore out quickly
Vehicle: Mazda
Mileage: 7500 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho Tires
Threet3n
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 1.0

Tires (Kumho Ecsta LX Platinum) were installed 6/25/2024 @ 151,xxx miles (with receipts). Manufactured date is May 2023. Currently, car has 165,xxx miles. As you can see, the two front (now rotated to rear) tires are bald! The other two tires have a normal amount of tread remaining however. I was running about 1° of camber front and rear, and explains why the inside is more worn, but doesn't explain the overall accelerated wear that occurred only on the fronts. I also have an alignment report showing only the front left Toe is out of spec (-0.39° measured vs. +/-0.08 spec).

In my opinion, this would fall under the warranty via excessive/premature tire wear, but of course I imagine any shop would fuss about the lack of rotation. To make matters worse, I purchased and installed these tires at Walmart, which I'm now learning isn't an authorized Kumho installer and Kumho's warranty form says they must be installed by an authorized installer. However, Walmart's own listing for the tires says it's covered by a 50k mile tread life warranty (see last photo).

Cons: premature wear, bald tires
Mileage: 14000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ... 74

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...