Tires IRONMAN or GISLAVED

GISLAVED Tires

I had a very good experience with the Gislaved Nordfrost 100s. They were fairly priced, they have a crazy amount of tread for a tire, and their performance was very good.

Pros: very good performance
Vehicle: Volvo
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
GISLAVED Tires

I had Conti Vikingcontacts and those were great. Also, they are hard to find, but Conti owns a company called Gislaved tires who make outstanding winter compounds. They are from Sweden and engineered specifically for Scandinavian, Canadian, and Russian winters.

Pros: great winter compounds
Cons: hard to find
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
IRONMAN Tires
d_em
  • Grip:
Rating 4.0

I’ve seen a lot of people in WA run Ironmans. Decent grip and decent thread wear. Solid tire for the money.

Pros: decent grip, decent wear
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
GISLAVED Tires

Gislaved tires. They are studded from the factory and made by Continental. They are at least 30% less cost than Nokians and nearly as good. I have had both and will buy the Gislaveds every time.

Pros: less cost, nearly as good
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
GISLAVED Tires

I use gislaved winter tires on my A4 and they have worked well for high speed highway driving and also wet winter roads. Full confidence in snowy conditions. I am going with the same on the OB.

Pros: confidence in snowy conditions
Vehicle: Audi A4
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
IRONMAN Tires

Avoid all Chinese crap. They’re complete shit, I’ve never hydroplaned a car before but I have on IronMan tires because of how bad they are.

Cons: hydroplaned a car
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 2 3 4 5

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...