Tires Hankook or YOKOHAMA

Hankook Tires
compy222
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 4.0

Can't comment on loudness as the S2000 is just plain loud, but have run these on the S2000 in both the earlier V12 and later Evo2 variety. pretty happy with them for a street tire, stable in the rain, predictable, and they seem to wear well (S2000's eat rear tires every 10k anyway on proper alignment specs).

Pros: stable in rain, predictable
Cons: none
Vehicle: Honda S2000
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Hankook Tires
visualistics
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 4.0

I used to run them on my S60R and really liked them. For the price they were decent. Not quite as quiet or grippy as some more expensive tires, but they've been my go-to for "slightly cheaper" tires for a while.

Pros: decent for the price
Cons: not quiet, not grippy
Vehicle: Volvo
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires
C0gSci
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 5.0

Yokohama Advan Sport A/S 245-45-19. Stock is 225-45-19. They fit well and the performance difference over stock is very noticeable (handles much better).

Pros: handles much better
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires
JGBloodworth
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 5.0

I bought the avid ascend gt tires about 2 weeks ago. Quiet and smooth ride so far. Comparable to my previous Michelin tires.

Pros: quiet and smooth ride
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires

They faired well, especially uphill. Trusted mechanic buddy said Blizzaks were the way to go, but these Yokohamas made me feel in control and handle well on the clear days

Pros: feel in control, handle well
Vehicle: Volkswagen
Mileage: 4000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Hankook Tires
CraigH
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 3.0

My 2017 Beetle S came with the tires specified immediately below...Hankook Kinergy GT...Originally, tire wear appeared to be proceeding well...After the 16,000 mile service...I noticed the centers of two tires...to have lost the siping \u2013 classic over-inflation indicator...Recently at 19,000 miles I noted the front tires...had lost the center siping \u2013 again signifying over-inflation...I am not particularly surprised at the center wear as I think a load index of 95 is fairly high for this vehicle...I cannot imagine 60,000 miles for these tires.

Pros: maintaining balance
Cons: center wear, lost siping
Mileage: 19000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 ... 118

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...