Tires Hankook or NITTO

Hankook Tires

I love my Hankook Ions, my MYP had the Pirelli Pzeros as my original set.

One thing that hasn’t been mentioned is the road noise and how much quieter the drive is.

Pros: quieter drive
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Hankook Tires

I’ve had both and the biggest difference I saw was the range hit. I was the sole driver so no difference in driving style - MPS AS4’s were 10% worse. Loved them but would go with the Hankooks were I to do it again.

Pros: would go again
Cons: none
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Hankook Tires
FearTheClown5
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

The Hankooks are slightly softer absorbing a smidge more of the road. Noise difference between the 2 isn't noticeable at all. The Hankooks are slightly more efficient, lifetime on the Michelins is 306whm and the Hankooks are 297whm(tracked via TeslaMate).

Pros: slightly more efficient
Cons: slightly softer
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Hankook Tires
rocket_808
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

So my OEM Hankook tires, inflated normally to 40psi were wearing down on the edges of the tire. The look of the tire is amazing. Completely changes the look of the truck. The tires didn’t have any more appreciable noise - I listened intently at 40 mph and might have heard a bit more

Pros: amazing look, little noise
Cons: wearing down on edges
Mileage: 26000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Hankook Tires
bites_stringcheese
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 5.0

With about 28,000 miles on my 2022 SEL AWD, it was time to replace the the Michelin's. I picked the Ions because it seemed like Hankook did their homework in terms of designing a tire with range and longevity considerations. Initial thoughts:

-VERY QUIET. These are somehow substantially quieter than the OEM wheels. Noise from bumps and rough roads are somehow soaked up as well. I'm impressed.

-Smooth and planted. Rolling on these at moderate speeds feels like floating on a cloud. Steering and acceleration/braking felt great too, no issues feeling like there's no grip.

-Didn't have too much rain experience, but it seemed to handle wet conditions fine, about the same as OEM.

-One con I noticed: These have a foam lining on the inside.

Pros: VERY QUIET, smooth and planted
Cons: foam lining inside
Mileage: 45061 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Hankook Tires

Depois de muita pesquisa em relação qualidade preço escolhi os Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125.

Pros: qualidade preço
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Hankook Tires

Go with the hankooks, they wear like iron.

If you are new to tracking and do end up heat cycling them out, they are super consistent, which is way better to learn from.

Pros: wear like iron
Cons: heat cycling them out
Vehicle: BMW
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
NITTO Tires

Reason I'm asking is I'm running Nitto NeoGens 280tw (205/50/15) on a fairly light, low horsepower car (D15B7 Del Sol). I've had alignments done, check my air pressure every other time I get gas (35psi) and I'm at the wear bars in 12k miles.

Cons: wear bars in 12k miles
Vehicle: Honda
Mileage: 12000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
NITTO Tires

I got mine 12/21 date code 48/21. I got about 40k on them. All 4 have dry rot. They suck in the rain and I am about to dump them.

Cons: dry rot, suck in rain
Mileage: 40000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
NITTO Tires

They’re trash tires. My Nittos hit 20k and lost enough traction on wet that I lost confidence in them. When a nail went thru the sidewall 4k miles later it gave me an excuse to upgrade to wildpeaks. The difference was huge.

Pros: upgrade to wildpeaks
Cons: lost traction on wet
Mileage: 20000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 ... 99

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...