Tires Hankook or Maxxis

Hankook Tires

After almost 3000 miles with my new Hankook tires, you can see the Wh/m difference from lifetime. 228.8 vs 254.5. to me that's a significant improvement. I also like that they are a tad bit quieter.

Pros: significant improvement, quieter
Mileage: 4828 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Maxxis Tires

As others have stated, it is important to factor in the tire's width when discussing the transition zone on the DHF. I love the 2.3 DHF. I find the 2.5 to be very good, but less predictable.

Pros: very good
Cons: less predictable
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Hankook Tires

I replaced my tires at 30k with Hankook Ion EVO AS EV tires. They are not cheap, but they are EV-rated and have good reviews.

Pros: good reviews, EV-rated
Cons: not cheap
Vehicle: Kia
Mileage: 30000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Hankook Tires

Rs4s are the super long (ive done 24hrs on a set) lasting, heatcyle to death with almost all its tread left tyre of choice... But conti ecf last just as long and run at least 1.5s faster per lap (@ wgi).

Pros: super long lasting, heatcycle death
Cons: conti ecf faster
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Hankook Tires

I do endurance racing as well and the sponsored tire is the Hankook Ventus RS-4. They are a great 200TW tire for traction and durability. If you abuse it they won’t last. They are directionally treaded, but if you run in the dry it won’t matter which direction you run them, so rotating doesn’t have to be an issue. Similar to the AR-1, good lifespan for the performance at the grip levels when compared to the competition.

Pros: great traction, good durability
Cons: won't last if abused
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Hankook Tires

Kankook RS4, Khumo V730, Conti ECF, Falken RT660+ are tires I would consider on long lasting side of the performance category. I'm not sure they even make the RS4 now but there should be lots of old stock. Those tend to last so long you end up heat cycling them before burning up the rubber.

Pros: long lasting, good performance
Cons: heat cycling them
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Maxxis Tires

Specialized control tyres and it’s not even close.

No it’s not worth the “premium” as they’re not more premium. The spesh tyres are specced on their £14000 bikes, they are also racing and winning world cups, cape epics, short track races, marathons for years with the rest of them. Spesh has led the way with a couple others with FEA and camps set up for surely testing their tyres with a refresh every few years. There is no “premium”. The stickers are fancier on the maxxis. But they’re heavier. Higher rolling resistance. Higher weight. No noticeable gain in traction to account for those either. Spesh offers sworks 120 tpi, softer and harder (T7 and T5 respectively) control tyres. All you’re choosing is 120 vs 60 tpi determining a less or more robust carcass.

A life long sworks 120 tpi snob. I went maxxis aspen and hated life. That’s a gravel tyre. Tore through the Vittoria barzo. Went ikon and they’re a great once was a race tyre now a recreational tyre— but been left for dead with rolling resistance, grip and weight by the competition. Rekon race won’t get a look in from the tyre tests and price and weight. Nah ta.

Pros: racing and winning world cups
Cons: heavier, higher resistance
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Hankook Tires

Also in Colorado with 50e. Have 21-inch wheels with factory Hankook “all season” performance run flats. Just ordered a set of Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5s for winter to replace the Hankooks that perform like I’m on an ice rink with bald tires…

Pros: for winter
Cons: perform like on ice
Vehicle: BMW X5
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 ... 84

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...