Tires Hankook or Laufenn

Hankook Tires
Head
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

I have the all weather EVO in Denver and I like them. They have a softer feel than the original OEM tire which makes them seem quieter. I don’t drive much when it snows but I haven’t found them to be a problem… just drive like a sane person. I recommended the Hankooks.

Pros: softer feel, quieter
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Laufenn Tires

Laufenn (produced by Hankook) serves me well. Bought 4 tires(205/50/16) from Hyperdrive for $600 2 years ago. Almost 20k on my honda jazz and still with heaps of thread left

Pros: heaps of thread left
Vehicle: Honda Jazz
Mileage: 20000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Hankook Tires

Hankooks handle snow and ice pretty well. But the compromise is they seem to be a very soft tire. I am lucky to get 32k of miles out of them. (They claim to be a 60k tire)

Pros: handle snow and ice
Cons: very soft tire
Mileage: 32000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Laufenn Tires

I,d trust a Laufen over an arroyo based on the overall treads, though typically the arroyos will last a little bit longer.

Pros: trust Laufen, overall treads
Cons: arroyos last longer
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Hankook Tires
CourseEcstatic6202
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 1.0

Welcome to Hankook on the CRV. Mine had barely 20k and they were toast. Called a tire shop and started to tell them my story and before I could finish they interrupted me and said, “let me guess. Hankook?” Apparently they are known for this. Never again will I buy a car with Hankook tires and never will I ever buy them as replacements. Total garbage.

Cons: total garbage, short life
Vehicle: Honda
Mileage: 20000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 ... 73

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...