Got it
We use cookies to collect statistics and improve your experience. Learn more.
Spare parts reviews ➔ All comparisons ➔ GISLAVED ➔ COMFORSER

Tires GISLAVED or COMFORSER

Reviews
All
GISLAVED
COMFORSER
GISLAVED › Tires
Eastern_Yam
  • Grip:
Rating 4.5

For a good balance of LONG wear and good grip I've been getting Gislaved NordFrosts. Those things seriously take four winters of high mileage, mostly bare pavement commuting to wear out.

Pros: long wear, good grip, durable
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
COMFORSER › Tires
ShadowedSoulx1
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 4.0

Comforser are well-known tires and they offer great traction and performance. Comforser off-road tires can easily handle deep muddy terrains and manage to maintain forward motion at all times. On the other hand, this tire brand is a little bit noisy, but they are great for highway use. Being manufactured in China, Comforser Tyres can offer the latest tyre technology which improves longevity, fuel consumption and performance in both wet and dry road conditions.

Pros: great traction, performance
Cons: a little noisy
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
COMFORSER › Tires
Ok_Rub3732
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 4.0

Id suggest learning ro drive better honestly. Comforser tyres are made in China by a Canadian company and are extremely reliable and cost effective.

Independently tested they are quieter than most and have excellent rating in wet conditions. We fit Comforser CF1100 on our landrover and they perform better than most other tyres in the most challenging conditions.

Pros: reliable and cost effective
Vehicle: Land Rover
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
COMFORSER › Tires
_trashedbags
  • Grip:
Rating 3.5

I ran a set for 45k kilometres on my TJ with suspension aligned nicely and liked them. Hard tyre, so wet grip when cold is below average.

Pros: good mileage, liked them
Cons: hard tyre, poor wet grip
Mileage: 45000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
COMFORSER › Tires
Sea_Composer6305
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 3.5

Ive got comforser 1100’s on the truck they are pretty common around here.good in snow and mud, they are ok on the highway I’ve put 75000km on them and am only about halfway through their lifespan and average 9.2l/100 (~26mpg.)with the babydiesel going about 130-140km/h (80-90mph) the biggest issue is they have to be rotated every oil change and aren’t as good as more expensive options in the rain.

Pros: good in snow and mud
Cons: not good in rain
Mileage: 75000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
COMFORSER › Tires
benjFPS
  • Grip:
Rating 1.0

Year old post I know, but a couple days ago my grandpa took my car to go get only my spare tyre changed, I come back from work and I see a pair of Comforser Cf510s on my VT Commodore. Didn’t think they could be THIS bad in the wet, I genuinely can’t even accelerate slightly faster than usual, my wheels just spin uncontrollably.

Cons: bad in the wet
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 2 3 4

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
VS

Tires MICHELIN or Continental

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Pirelli

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Falken

VS

Tires MICHELIN or BRIDGESTONE

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Goodyear

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Nokia

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Hankook

VS

Tires MICHELIN or YOKOHAMA

Show all

Which tires to choose — GISLAVED or COMFORSER?

If choosing tires across many manufacturers, check the part ranking. If your choice is down to two brands, the PartReview part comparisons help.

We compare tires across these categories:

Comparison of tires GISLAVED and COMFORSER
  1. PR Score.
  2. Overall ranking.
  3. Vote balance.
  4. Average rating.
  5. Number of reviews.
  6. Feature ratings.
  7. Car owners’ choice.

Which tires are better — COMFORSER or GISLAVED?

In March 2026 on PartReview, tires GISLAVED were overall better than COMFORSER.

  1. GISLAVED received a PR Score of 94 out of 100, and COMFORSER scored 59 points.
  2. GISLAVED ranked 29 in the overall ranking, and COMFORSER ranked 57.
  3. The average rating is higher for GISLAVED (4.6) than for COMFORSER (3.1).
  4. Tires GISLAVED have better feature ratings than COMFORSER:
    • Grip - owners believe, that this property for GISLAVED is better than COMFORSER.
    • Noise - drivers claim, that this property for GISLAVED is outperforms COMFORSER.
    • Ride comfort - reviews suggest, that this property for GISLAVED is preferred to COMFORSER.

Which tires are more popular — GISLAVED or COMFORSER?

In March 2026 on PartReview, tires GISLAVED were overall more popular than COMFORSER.

By vote balance, tires GISLAVED surpassed COMFORSER:

  • For GISLAVED, the ratio of positive (73) to negative (4) votes is 69 votes.
  • For COMFORSER, the ratio of positive (19) to negative (13) votes is 6 votes.

By number of reviews, tires GISLAVED surpassed COMFORSER:

  • For tires GISLAVED there are 25 reviews: 23 positive, 2 neutral, 0 negative.
  • For tires COMFORSER there are 10 reviews: 5 positive, 2 neutral, 3 negative.

Which tires do car owners prefer — GISLAVED or COMFORSER?

In March 2026, according to PartReview, tires GISLAVED and COMFORSER have not taken top places in car-specific ratings. You can help by adding your review about these manufacturers.

Other comparisons of tires

If this comparison didn’t fully answer your question, there are many others on PartReview.

For example, comparisons of tires GISLAVED with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, YOKOHAMA, Toyo.

Also available: comparisons of tires COMFORSER with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, YOKOHAMA, Toyo.

You can also see who is better among other tires manufacturers: MICHELIN or Continental, MICHELIN or Pirelli, MICHELIN or Falken, MICHELIN or BRIDGESTONE, MICHELIN or Goodyear.

Loading...
›